nut addon looks for .so library files not .so.0

[Adolf Belka <adolf.belka@ipfire.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1559 bytes --]

Hi Michael & all,

nut has a command nut-scanner which scans for nut systems.

An IPFire user has used that command and it came back saying that it 
couldn't find the USB library libusb-1.0.so which is commented out in 
the rootfile.

It looks like nut when it is checking what libraries are available for 
the nut-scanner is looking for the .so files only and not the .so.0 or 
.so.0.3.0 files.

The same thing is occurring with avahi and netsnmp where nut is again 
only looking for the .so files, so in all three cases nut concludes that 
the usb, avahi and netsnmp libraries are not present even when they are.

It looks like no one has ever used the nut-scanner command and flagged 
up the issue as it will have had this problem for ever, as the 
libusb-1.0.so file has always been commented out (standard IPFire 
practice for rootfiles)

What should we do in this case when nut is only looking for the .so 
files. Should we uncomment the required .so libs?

The only alternative that I can see would be to comment out the command 
nut-scanner.

If we do uncomment the .so lib files mentioned above, how do we ensure 
that they stay uncommented and someone in the future does not see them 
and comment them out in the rootfiles.

I did that with nut about two years ago. I don't know now if that means 
that some of nut will not be properly working or not.

Should I now go an uncomment all the nut .so file entries in the nut 
rootfile?

Feedback and suggestions of the best approach for this gladly accepted.

Regards,
Adolf.

-- 
Sent from my laptop