From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Various mount options have changed in Core Update 169
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:41:46 +0100
Message-ID: <465A366A-4FD1-46C1-8D3B-9C0B16475C8F@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <8b05614d-bf3f-df6d-1157-b4d21235329f@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9173562878047644045=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============9173562878047644045==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I suppose this is coming from changing dracut.

Unless I am reading your diff wrong, those options have been added which is a=
 good thing?!

-Michael

> On 20 Jun 2022, at 21:34, Peter M=C3=BCller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wr=
ote:
>=20
> Hello *,
>=20
> while pre-testing Core Update 169, it came to my attention that, for some r=
eason,
> various mount options have changed since Core Update 168, lacking options s=
uch as
> "nodev", "noexec", "nosuid", which means a security downgrade.
>=20
> The complete delta is as follows:
>=20
> $ diff -Naur before after
> --- before	2022-06-20 20:04:32.436632074 +0000
> +++ after	2022-06-20 20:04:34.500401575 +0000
> @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
> -devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,relatime,gid=3D5,mode=3D620,ptmxmode=3D=
000)
> +devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=3D5,mode=3D6=
20,ptmxmode=3D000)
> /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime)
> /dev/sda2 on /boot/efi type vfat (rw,relatime,fmask=3D0022,dmask=3D0022,cod=
epage=3D437,iocharset=3Dascii,shortname=3Dmixed,errors=3Dremount-ro)
> /dev/sda4 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime)
> -devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,relatime,size=3D1963708k,nr_inodes=3D49=
0927,mode=3D755)
> +devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,nosuid,noexec,size=3D1949992k,nr_inodes=
=3D487498,mode=3D755)
> efivarfs on /sys/firmware/efi/efivars type efivarfs (rw,relatime)
> none on /sys/fs/cgroup type cgroup2 (rw,relatime)
> -/proc on /proc type proc (rw,relatime)
> -/run on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=3D8192k,mode=3D755)
> -/sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,relatime)
> -tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,relatime)
> +proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> +sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> +tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec)
> +tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=3D755)
> /var/lock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=3D8192k)
>=20
> I cannot recall of having this explicitly changed anywhere, and don't under=
stand
> the root cause for this (unwanted) change. Could somebody please point me i=
nto the
> right direction? :-)
>=20
> Thanks in advance, and best regards,
> Peter M=C3=BCller


--===============9173562878047644045==--