From: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: A few updates - built under Core 120
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 22:19:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47b733b4-c1cf-5a68-6fcc-f7b365388800@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b907e270ed88c77ce108b4b3401d0d05f02de106.camel@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3105 bytes --]
Hi,
On 03.05.2018 21:34, Michael Tremer wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Ah, sorry I forget to check this out.
>
> I just started my build and it will need a while now to go to the point where it
> crashes. Probably has something to do with the core update folder. Just delete
> that and the build should complete without creating any core updates.
Just saw this.
Core 120:
root(a)Devel: /home/matz/ipfire-2.x/config/rootfiles/core/120/filelists
next:
root(a)Devel: /home/matz/ipfire-2.x/config/rootfiles/core/121/fileslists
^^^^^^^^^^
Typo?
Best,
Matthias
> Best,
> - -Michael
>
> On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 20:19 +0200, Peter Müller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> just curios: Does anyone have an idea why the next-tree won't build?
>> I poked a little bit, but without satisfying results.
>>
>> Like Matthias, I am also interested in updating packages for IPFire 2.x,
>> and experiencing the same problem (testing). Usually, I do that in
>> a VM, but some network stuff is hard to port into that environment.
>> Maybe we could specify some criteria here, but that is nothing with
>> a high priority...
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Peter Müller
>>
>> > Perfect. Keep them coming. It is good to bundle them together and align the
>> > patches a little with the release schedule of the Core Updates though.
>> >
>> > Also, please try to encourage people to review and *test*. We need to have
>> > more
>> > eyeballs on the patches that we merge than just mine.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > -Michael
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 19:01 +0200, Matthias Fischer wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > as I wrote, current 'next' won't build for me - it still doesn't.
>> > >
>> > > So I prepared the following updates under Core 119 / Core 120:
>> > >
>> > > pcre => 8.4.2
>> > > libidn => 1.34
>> > > nano => 2.9.6
>> > > htop => 2.2.0
>> > > openssh => 7.7.p1
>> > > unbound => 1.7.1
>> > >
>> > > All of these are running here, patches follow.
>> > >
>> > > If anyone has any concerns about this, please let me know.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Matthias
>>
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE5/rW5l3GGe2ypktxgHnw/2+QCQcFAlrrZFkACgkQgHnw/2+Q
> CQc4UQ//RJExr7KDBXYWaMmaTaTA9+lSaSG4wJ5mm6NXaKc6sKpQ8/TCrYZ6dgaA
> EtEKENLv7fx+Ch9zcdwAgfEDqLFONhtsA3crwvlwoFdYI4XlXQ8uJIRCUkvx10MW
> OLmlFNmDfDm3LO+ZlpGqwKOkh1PBOo0iVnFV8gr4iIsH3Kpeq9FPw2Ls8yx4HXvr
> nJRefshrpLdF33ARn+BbZZvj7iv3b5KgeIHagNpOjyTKMx7ggcpv7YD84V5lrQYV
> bluDnlcQsq6UVj7PveuNx02FaOO8a7D+z4nUas01ofXH+dvFFumjKWxtwJ5yM7rr
> bcYiiKQj4IOlLxmvdvcvpjZpVsHEZcFZwB1SvBqzSGS/oOHhxtHGJXQDU/l7nVUn
> 7KFBEc78QXbSOv3DD/5UaU5HkwBuqo1HWA1bOvyHRywIQeGvcS/rgIu4c548Gjwd
> +XC9ywbY5yKQf6JKfTeaAkPfACOskV3+UVlyu7xc3feqcIBQnTPVnJe+cyz7FgYk
> R3NCLEZXN/tJqOU5mPXpOBBKKO0w/ivj3SMgivmU2bmDqeEBAR7RaSVlGYl3paU1
> HPRjxfyMDQKLJ0mITsTWkCvV/mI7bu5QwgH+n1kihgAo8Snx2Q69Ge9HptvF/IVq
> qIZ0gXgqBx/IF7c0W9cLN21qppfepsm2V+XPqOjLGZb0PZgJtUI=
> =YkXc
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-04 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-03 17:01 Matthias Fischer
2018-05-03 17:08 ` Michael Tremer
2018-05-03 18:19 ` Peter Müller
2018-05-03 19:34 ` Michael Tremer
2018-05-04 20:13 ` Matthias Fischer
2018-05-04 20:19 ` Matthias Fischer [this message]
2018-05-05 17:50 ` 'next' with new kernel 4.14.39 took a long time - (was: Re: A few updates - built under Core 120) Matthias Fischer
2018-05-06 22:55 ` 'next' with new kernel 4.14.39 took a long time - Matthias Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47b733b4-c1cf-5a68-6fcc-f7b365388800@ipfire.org \
--to=matthias.fischer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox