From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Murphy To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] flash-images: Drop 2gb-ext4 from image filename Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:03:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4989289A-1DEB-49C3-B939-4EB56006F02E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20220808202742.1120200-1-michael.tremer@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2036094537126021908==" List-Id: --===============2036094537126021908== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I=E2=80=99ve always been curious about the 2 GB max size.=20 When the internet was slow and HDs were expensive it made perfect sense. But = I am curious why not 3 GB or 4 GB? No rush - just curious. Jon > On Aug 8, 2022, at 3:27 PM, Michael Tremer wr= ote: >=20 > This is now being dropped since the image won't fit onto a 2GB device > any more and since there is only one type of image, we don't need to > state the filesystem type. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Michael Tremer > --- > lfs/flash-images | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/lfs/flash-images b/lfs/flash-images > index b4fde8dd9..af78f5de9 100644 > --- a/lfs/flash-images > +++ b/lfs/flash-images > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ ifeq "$(EFI)" "1" > endif > PART_ROOT =3D /dev/mapper/$(patsubst /dev/%,%,$(DEVICE))p3 >=20 > -IMAGE_FILE =3D /install/images/$(SNAME)-$(VERSION).2gb-ext4.$(BUILD_ARCH)-= full-core$(CORE).img.xz > +IMAGE_FILE =3D /install/images/$(SNAME)-$(VERSION)-core$(CORE)-$(BUILD_ARC= H).img.xz >=20 > FSTAB_FMT =3D UUID=3D%s %-8s %-4s %-10s %d %d\n >=20 > --=20 > 2.30.2 >=20 --===============2036094537126021908==--