From: Adolf Belka <adolf.belka@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Problem building a version update of rng-tools
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 15:23:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e013951-d847-8d59-9682-0a4a023081b9@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cd4e7a2-3315-2113-a025-30974830cbef@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3880 bytes --]
Hi Michael,
On 03/05/2023 14:58, Adolf Belka wrote:
>
> On 03/05/2023 14:35, Adolf Belka wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On 03/05/2023 14:07, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>> Hello Adolf,
>>>
>>> Normally you should not need to add anything extra for this to work. The compiler should know where to search for libraries.
>>>
>>> If pkg-config is being used, this might be a little bit different.
>> Just before the various packages are checked to exist the configure also checks that pkg-config is existing.
>>>
>>>> On 3 May 2023, at 13:02, Adolf Belka <adolf.belka(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is a new version for rng-tools so I thought I would do an update but it kept stopping saying that it required libcap and could not find it.
>>>>
>>>> I noted that the libcap libs are in /lib and not in /usr/lib as the other packages that rng-tools looks for have their libs. (openssl, libxml2, curl, jansson)
>>>>
>>>> The new version has a flag for the ./configure called libcap_LIBS which can be used to override pkg-config.
>>>>
>>>> I tried that in various ways such as libcap_LIBS="/lib" or libcap_LIBS="/lib/libcap.so.2.67" and others, but none of them worked. The ./configure still ended up with the message
>>>>
>>>> checking for libcap... no
>>>> configure: error: libcap is required
>>>>
>>>> I then noticed that libcap.pc is in /lib/pkgconfig/ while all the other packages being searched for are in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/
>>>
>>> This should indeed be installed to /usr/lib/pkgconfig.
>>>
>>> I don’t have a problem with simply changing —-prefix=/ to —-prefix=/usr for libcap, because we don’t support a split /usr directory anyways. That should make it easier.
> Looking through the libcap README and Makefile then the .pc files should be getting placed in /usr/lib/pkgconfig but they aren't. Also as $(prefix) is not defined then the prefix should be /usr but again it is not.
I think I must have misread what the Makefile etc were intending to do.
I just tried a quick build of libcap with adding prefix=/usr to the make and make install lines and the lib files and the .pc files are now in /usr/lib/ and /usr/lib/pkgconfig/
The only remaining question I have is if anything else in IPFire would be expecting to see the lib files for libcap in /lib/ instead of /usr/lib/ because then the symlinking of the lib from /lib/ to /usr/lib/ won't be needed any more.
What is libcap used for so I can test out the built iso on a vm machine?
Regards,
Adolf.
>> libcap currently keeps the library files in /lib/ but makes a symlink to one of them in /usr/lib/. Libcap doesn't have a configure line. There is a sed command on the Makefile to stop it building static libs and then it goes straight to make and then make install
>>>
>>>> I then manually did a copy of libcap.pc to /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ and then re ran just the rng-tools build and it then successfully found libcap and completed the build. So the problem is definitely to do withy the unusual location for the library files of libcap.
>>>
>>> Do we have any other packages that install .pc files into funny places?
>> The other .pc files that are in /lib/pkgconfig/ are libkeyutils, libproc-2, libpsx and libsysfs
>>>
> The libpsx.pc file is also from libcap.
>>>> So the question I have is what is the best way to deal with this.
>>>>
>>>> Should I add into the libcap lfs a line that copies the libcap.pc to /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ or
>>>>
>>>> is can someone tell me what I am doing wrong with the libcap_LIBS flag for ./configure
>>>>
> I think that rather than trying to adjust libcap to work the way it says it should be anyway, I will add a copy line into the lfs to move the libcap.pc file to /usr/lib/pkgconfig/
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Adolf.
>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Adolf.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-03 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-03 12:02 Adolf Belka
2023-05-03 12:07 ` Michael Tremer
2023-05-03 12:35 ` Adolf Belka
2023-05-03 12:58 ` Adolf Belka
2023-05-03 13:23 ` Adolf Belka [this message]
2023-05-03 15:39 ` Michael Tremer
2023-05-03 15:57 ` Adolf Belka
2023-05-03 16:09 ` Adolf Belka
2023-05-03 17:16 ` Michael Tremer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e013951-d847-8d59-9682-0a4a023081b9@ipfire.org \
--to=adolf.belka@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox