From: Stefan Schantl <stefan.schantl@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] Suricata Configuration Updates
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2019 10:57:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e38d27220d08d1230bff88a795ff6ea6b388fb8.camel@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F1E9C175-D90B-4BA0-BC8E-952DDFB2B781@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4088 bytes --]
Hello Michael,
thanks for rebasing and resubmitting your patches.
This time everything worked well - merged.
Best regards,
-Stefan
> Hi,
>
> I rebased the whole branch and sent a second patchset with the three
> remaining patches only.
>
> Hope that helps and merges.
>
> -Michael
>
> > On 2 Mar 2019, at 16:52, Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Why are you asking me that?
> >
> > What does “git am” tell you? There should be a reason why it didn’t
> > work.
> >
> > Probably there have been other changes in the section?
> >
> > -Michael
> >
> > > On 1 Mar 2019, at 19:01, Stefan Schantl <
> > > stefan.schantl(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Did you apply all of them in order?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, I did.
> > >
> > > The reported two patches did not apply.
> > >
> > > However, the changes on the second patch depends on modifications
> > > of
> > > the first one, but why does the first one does not apply by using
> > > "git
> > > am" ?
> > >
> > > > It is not very helpful to only merge half the patchset.
> > > >
> > > > Did you use pwclient?
> > > >
> > > > -Michael
> > > >
> > > > > On 1 Mar 2019, at 17:09, Stefan Schantl <
> > > > > stefan.schantl(a)ipfire.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Michael,
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks for working on optimizing the suricata configuration
> > > > > file.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've merged all of the patches except number "8" and "10"
> > > > > which
> > > > > does
> > > > > not apply with "git am".
> > > > >
> > > > > When simple adding the changes with "patch" the changes can
> > > > > be
> > > > > applied
> > > > > - any idea why this happened?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > >
> > > > > -Stefan
> > > > > > I have worked on suricata's configuration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My objective was to use more system resources (because
> > > > > > suricata
> > > > > > did
> > > > > > not use much RAM, etc.)
> > > > > > to make it faster and to be able to have some deeper
> > > > > > decoding and
> > > > > > matching.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please review these changes and let me know what you think.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All in all, suricata should not use more than 1G of RAM
> > > > > > which I
> > > > > > think
> > > > > > is a very good
> > > > > > amount. If your system is weaker than that, there is no
> > > > > > point in
> > > > > > running an IPS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On my system in my office, this runs with a hand full of
> > > > > > rules
> > > > > > enabled from the
> > > > > > Emerging Threats Community set at around 110MB of RAM.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael Tremer (20):
> > > > > > Revert "Suricata: detect DNS events on port 853, too"
> > > > > > suricata: Set max-pending-packets to 1024
> > > > > > suricata: Set default packet size to 1514
> > > > > > suricata: Set detection profile to high
> > > > > > suricata: Drop profiling section from configuration
> > > > > > suricata: Drop some commented stuff from configuration
> > > > > > suricata: Drop sections that require Rust
> > > > > > suricata: Configure HTTP decoder
> > > > > > suricata: Allow 32MB of RAM for DNS decoding
> > > > > > suricata: Drop parsers I have never heard of
> > > > > > suricata: We do not use any IP reputation lists
> > > > > > suricata: Log to syslog
> > > > > > suricata: Use the correct path for the magic database
> > > > > > suricata: Use 64MB of RAM for defragmentation
> > > > > > suricata: Use up to 256MB of RAM for the flow cache
> > > > > > suricata: Log to syslog like a normal process
> > > > > > suricata: Increase memory size for the stream engine
> > > > > > suricata: Disable decoding for Teredo
> > > > > > suricata: Start capture first and then load rules
> > > > > > suricata: Fix syntax error
> > > > > >
> > > > > > config/etc/syslog.conf | 2 +-
> > > > > > config/suricata/suricata.yaml | 282 +++++----------------
> > > > > > ------
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > ----------
> > > > > > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 254 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-03 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190228142825.5153-1-michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
2019-03-01 17:09 ` Stefan Schantl
2019-03-01 17:18 ` Michael Tremer
2019-03-01 19:01 ` Stefan Schantl
2019-03-02 16:52 ` Michael Tremer
2019-03-02 17:19 ` Michael Tremer
2019-03-03 9:57 ` Stefan Schantl [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e38d27220d08d1230bff88a795ff6ea6b388fb8.camel@ipfire.org \
--to=stefan.schantl@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox