From: Robin Roevens <robin.roevens@disroot.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Few questions concerning creating addon package
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 20:29:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f10e4300d701818619a24eab7e3314e9e9ab98d.camel@filekeeper.sicho.home> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1873 bytes --]
Hi all
Firstly, thank you Adolf for the encouragement and extra pointers to
start this task..
I think I have currently successfully prepared a new version of the
zabbix_agentd package containing latest zabbix_agentd LTS version
(v5.0.9).
I tested the package on an ipfire-test-vm instance set up with the iso
built by the make.sh script and then manually unpacking the package
using the instructions of
https://wiki.ipfire.org/devel/ipfire-2-x/addon-howto and all seems well
except that the service is not automatically started during install.sh
which calls:
---
restore_backup ${NAME}
start_service --background ${NAME}
---
So I'm assuming ${NAME} is not available when I manually run install.sh
as per instructions, and that it will be available when pakfire itself
installs the package?
Is there a way to test the actual package deployment using pakfire ?
Then I have a few other questions:
- In the LFS template there is a PAK_VER variable, and it is not clear
to me what this exactly is. Is this a revision number for current
packaged version? or just a 'counter' for how many package versions
there have been for this program in IPFire ?
- In the LFS template for current zabbix_agentd v4.2.6 DL_FROM is
pointing to URL_IPFIRE.. Should this be changed ? Or should I upload
the new source-file for v5.0.9 to URL_IPFIRE in some way ? (are there
instructions somewhere?) or ..?
Then a more practical question:
Next to 'just' an upgrade of the current Zabbix agent I also added a
few config files etc for use with my Zabbix IPFire specific monitoring
template. This changes Alexander's original config a little, but should
remain backwards compatible.
Should I submit this as 2 separate patches or will a single patch
suffice?
Regards
Robin
--
Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke
inhoud door MailScanner en lijkt schoon te zijn.
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-28 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-28 18:29 Robin Roevens [this message]
2021-03-28 20:21 ` Adolf Belka
2021-03-28 21:41 ` Robin Roevens
2021-03-29 6:31 ` Adolf Belka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f10e4300d701818619a24eab7e3314e9e9ab98d.camel@filekeeper.sicho.home \
--to=robin.roevens@disroot.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox