* BUG 10262
@ 2012-12-05 6:42 Alexander Marx
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Alexander Marx @ 2012-12-05 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 696 bytes --]
Dear List.
I confirmed Bug #10262.
The webinterface is programmed inconsistently. Under the OPENVPN
advanced options, the field "domain" is checked via
&General::validfqdnname which checks, if the domainname has two parts,
seperated by a dot.
under the DHCP options, the "domain" field is written into the CONF File
without any checks.
Which of the developers is responsible for the DHCP code?
AND: What is the GENERAL policy for a domain name?
Should there be just a name (which also needs to be checked) or do we
need to have a dot-sperarated domain name?
I don't know what is the RFC for this, but i think it should be in DNS
compatible form "domain.toplevel".
Any thoughts?
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-12-05 6:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-05 6:42 BUG 10262 Alexander Marx
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox