From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adolf Belka To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Scheduling of Core Update 173 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:08:57 +0100 Message-ID: <536756d8-4d39-cca9-0e33-d4d1bc0f6c38@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: <7701beb2-5a8f-9d57-76e2-ba4827c62f0a@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0394605074602806388==" List-Id: --===============0394605074602806388== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Matthias, On 23/01/2023 18:37, Matthias Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > just to keep you informed... > > In progress of being pushed: > logwatch 7.7 =3D> 7.8 (running here on Core 172, looking good) > > Working on: > cmake 3.21.0 =3D> 3.25.2 > lsof 4.95.0.linux =3D> 4.98 Don't bother with lsof. I did an update in a previous CU but there was a=20 bug which meant that the lsof patch had to be reverted. https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13015 > nano 7.1 =3D> 7.2 I had nano on my list. As you are working on it I will drop it from mine=20 and leave it to you. Regards, Adolf. > Should be ready by the end of the week. > > Best, > Matthias > > On 23.01.2023 16:36, Peter M=C3=BCller wrote: >> Hello development folks, >> >> above all, sorry for me being rather absent recently due to the usual bunch >> of things on my plate, and the day only having 24 hours, which is way too >> little for me to get all of that done. >> >> [Insert a Monthy Python-style "anyway" here...] >> >> With regards to Core Update 173, we already have quite something in it, in= cluding >> a brand new kernel (thanks, Arne!), the QMI feature developed by Michael, = and >> a lot of other things that I currently cannot recall, but will once I'm wr= iting >> the changelog. >> >> >From my side, updates for Tor, libloc and the Squid ASNBL helper are still >> missing, and I will take care of that in due course. Aside from that, I'm = working >> through patchwork, and will get back to the authors of patches I have not = merged >> so far later, if necessary. >> >> Closing the Core Update by the end of this week seems sensible to me, so w= e can >> give it an extended testing phase, given the plethora of changes in it - i= n case >> of QMI, we suspect it will break IPTV, but none of the core developers is = able >> to test that. >> >> Please keep the patches coming (many thanks for them, as always), and let = me >> know if there are any questions/concerns/comments. >> >> Thanks, and best regards, >> Peter M=C3=BCller (back to the batcave :-) >> --=20 Sent from my laptop --===============0394605074602806388==--