From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] Suricata Configuration Updates
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 16:52:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A91EB7-56CC-4CA0-9693-A20734124D63@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf1ca24ad2dd9ae53cc9ee51495b4bd6a0d9a844.camel@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3097 bytes --]
Why are you asking me that?
What does “git am” tell you? There should be a reason why it didn’t work.
Probably there have been other changes in the section?
-Michael
> On 1 Mar 2019, at 19:01, Stefan Schantl <stefan.schantl(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Did you apply all of them in order?
>>
>
> Yes, I did.
>
> The reported two patches did not apply.
>
> However, the changes on the second patch depends on modifications of
> the first one, but why does the first one does not apply by using "git
> am" ?
>
>> It is not very helpful to only merge half the patchset.
>>
>> Did you use pwclient?
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>>> On 1 Mar 2019, at 17:09, Stefan Schantl <stefan.schantl(a)ipfire.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Michael,
>>>
>>> thanks for working on optimizing the suricata configuration file.
>>>
>>> I've merged all of the patches except number "8" and "10" which
>>> does
>>> not apply with "git am".
>>>
>>> When simple adding the changes with "patch" the changes can be
>>> applied
>>> - any idea why this happened?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> -Stefan
>>>> I have worked on suricata's configuration.
>>>>
>>>> My objective was to use more system resources (because suricata
>>>> did
>>>> not use much RAM, etc.)
>>>> to make it faster and to be able to have some deeper decoding and
>>>> matching.
>>>>
>>>> Please review these changes and let me know what you think.
>>>>
>>>> All in all, suricata should not use more than 1G of RAM which I
>>>> think
>>>> is a very good
>>>> amount. If your system is weaker than that, there is no point in
>>>> running an IPS.
>>>>
>>>> On my system in my office, this runs with a hand full of rules
>>>> enabled from the
>>>> Emerging Threats Community set at around 110MB of RAM.
>>>>
>>>> Michael Tremer (20):
>>>> Revert "Suricata: detect DNS events on port 853, too"
>>>> suricata: Set max-pending-packets to 1024
>>>> suricata: Set default packet size to 1514
>>>> suricata: Set detection profile to high
>>>> suricata: Drop profiling section from configuration
>>>> suricata: Drop some commented stuff from configuration
>>>> suricata: Drop sections that require Rust
>>>> suricata: Configure HTTP decoder
>>>> suricata: Allow 32MB of RAM for DNS decoding
>>>> suricata: Drop parsers I have never heard of
>>>> suricata: We do not use any IP reputation lists
>>>> suricata: Log to syslog
>>>> suricata: Use the correct path for the magic database
>>>> suricata: Use 64MB of RAM for defragmentation
>>>> suricata: Use up to 256MB of RAM for the flow cache
>>>> suricata: Log to syslog like a normal process
>>>> suricata: Increase memory size for the stream engine
>>>> suricata: Disable decoding for Teredo
>>>> suricata: Start capture first and then load rules
>>>> suricata: Fix syntax error
>>>>
>>>> config/etc/syslog.conf | 2 +-
>>>> config/suricata/suricata.yaml | 282 +++++----------------------
>>>> -----
>>>> ----------
>>>> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 254 deletions(-)
>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-02 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190228142825.5153-1-michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
2019-03-01 17:09 ` Stefan Schantl
2019-03-01 17:18 ` Michael Tremer
2019-03-01 19:01 ` Stefan Schantl
2019-03-02 16:52 ` Michael Tremer [this message]
2019-03-02 17:19 ` Michael Tremer
2019-03-03 9:57 ` Stefan Schantl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54A91EB7-56CC-4CA0-9693-A20734124D63@ipfire.org \
--to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox