Sure.

Reviewed-by: Timo Eissler <timo.eissler(a)ipfire.org>

Am 04.10.2015 um 19:07 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 12:25 -0400, Tom Rymes wrote:
>> On 10/03/2015 5:31 PM, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>> If an IPsec VPN connections is not established, there are
>>> rare cases when packets are supposed to be sent through
>>> that said tunnel and incorrectly handled.
>> Michael, et. al.:
>>
>> I just posted a comment on the bug before I realized that e-mail
>> would 
>> be more appropriate.
>>
>> My apologies for not being up to speed on this, but can you hold my
>> hand 
>> on implementing this? I am simply not confident enough to apply these
>> changes without a better understanding of what I am doing.
> You got this already applied (at least the bare essence of that). I
> think we should wait for someone else to confirm that this is not
> crashing anything :)
>
> Since I emailed this patch I am still wondering if we should not limit
> this rule to the RED interface. We didn't do that when we tried all
> this on one of your machines (
> https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10908#c16). It is an easier
> solution, but I am wondering if that does not have any side-effects...
>
> @Timo: You should use the Reviewed-by: tag then.
>
> Best,
> -Michael
>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Tom

-- 
Timo Eissler
Senior Project Engineer / Consultant

Am Zuckerberg 54
D-71640 Ludwigsburg

Tel.: +49 7141 4094003
Mobil.: +49 151 20650311
Email: timo(a)teissler.de