Core Update 95 release schedule

Core Update 95 release schedule

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 629 bytes --]

Hello,

this is just a short information about the upcoming Core Update.

Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug fixes. It
will appear on the testing tree shortly and I *strongly* recommend to
install the update as soon as possible and to give it a good test.

Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that so that it
would be very convenient if as many bugs can be found as possible
before the end of this week.

We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.

See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog will follow
on the IPFire Planet as usual.

Best,
-Michael

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[Daniel Weismüller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 961 bytes --]

Hi,

Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.

If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank white 
screen and nothing else.
No error, no logentry and no mail.

Is there someone else with that problem?

- Daniel

Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> Hello,
>
> this is just a short information about the upcoming Core Update.
>
> Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug fixes. It
> will appear on the testing tree shortly and I *strongly* recommend to
> install the update as soon as possible and to give it a good test.
>
> Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that so that it
> would be very convenient if as many bugs can be found as possible
> before the end of this week.
>
> We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
>
> See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog will follow
> on the IPFire Planet as usual.
>
> Best,
> -Michael

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1271 bytes --]

Hi,

On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 16:27 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.
> 
> If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank white 
> screen and nothing else.
> No error, no logentry and no mail.

There must be something in the logs. Could you please check what the
reason is and if applicable open a bug? You can probably assign this to
Alex.

> 
> Is there someone else with that problem?
> 
> - Daniel

-Michael

> 
> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > this is just a short information about the upcoming Core Update.
> > 
> > Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug fixes. It
> > will appear on the testing tree shortly and I *strongly* recommend
> > to
> > install the update as soon as possible and to give it a good test.
> > 
> > Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that so
> > that it
> > would be very convenient if as many bugs can be found as possible
> > before the end of this week.
> > 
> > We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
> > 
> > See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog will
> > follow
> > on the IPFire Planet as usual.
> > 
> > Best,
> > -Michael
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[R. W. Rodolico]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2316 bytes --]

I can see the same problem. I reported a problem with the 94, and it
turned out that the upgrade did not go as well as expected. I'm trying
to remember, but I believe it was that a file had to be linked someplace.

I'll try to look up my old ticket and also do some troubleshooting here
when I get back tomorrow.

In my case, my firewall has been used and abused; it has been upgraded
to RC's fairly often and there are several little bugs in it. For one
thing, it does not create /var/run/openvpn, so it can not start
net-to-net connections (I just wrote a little script I run to fix that).

Daniel, do you have the same thing? Your test machine is actually some
production machine that you simply keep up to date on the new RC's to
test? I'm beginning to wonder if I should not just do a fresh install.
But, I'll do some additional troubleshooting on this first.

Rod

On 11/12/2015 01:14 PM, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 16:27 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.
>> 
>> If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank
>> white screen and nothing else. No error, no logentry and no
>> mail.
> 
> There must be something in the logs. Could you please check what
> the reason is and if applicable open a bug? You can probably assign
> this to Alex.
> 
>> 
>> Is there someone else with that problem?
>> 
>> - Daniel
> 
> -Michael
> 
>> 
>> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> this is just a short information about the upcoming Core
>>> Update.
>>> 
>>> Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug
>>> fixes. It will appear on the testing tree shortly and I
>>> *strongly* recommend to install the update as soon as possible
>>> and to give it a good test.
>>> 
>>> Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that
>>> so that it would be very convenient if as many bugs can be
>>> found as possible before the end of this week.
>>> 
>>> We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
>>> 
>>> See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog
>>> will follow on the IPFire Planet as usual.
>>> 
>>> Best, -Michael

-- 
Rod Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465
214.827.2170
http://www.dailydata.net

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[Daniel Weismüller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2499 bytes --]

Hi Rod

I found and reopened you Bug.

Yes indeed the machine I use has got a lot of updates. ;)
But I think it is important that the updates work fine on those machines 
as well.

- Daniel

Am 13.11.2015 um 05:05 schrieb R. W. Rodolico:
> I can see the same problem. I reported a problem with the 94, and it
> turned out that the upgrade did not go as well as expected. I'm trying
> to remember, but I believe it was that a file had to be linked someplace.
>
> I'll try to look up my old ticket and also do some troubleshooting here
> when I get back tomorrow.
>
> In my case, my firewall has been used and abused; it has been upgraded
> to RC's fairly often and there are several little bugs in it. For one
> thing, it does not create /var/run/openvpn, so it can not start
> net-to-net connections (I just wrote a little script I run to fix that).
>
> Daniel, do you have the same thing? Your test machine is actually some
> production machine that you simply keep up to date on the new RC's to
> test? I'm beginning to wonder if I should not just do a fresh install.
> But, I'll do some additional troubleshooting on this first.
>
> Rod
>
> On 11/12/2015 01:14 PM, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 16:27 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.
>>>
>>> If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank
>>> white screen and nothing else. No error, no logentry and no
>>> mail.
>> There must be something in the logs. Could you please check what
>> the reason is and if applicable open a bug? You can probably assign
>> this to Alex.
>>
>>> Is there someone else with that problem?
>>>
>>> - Daniel
>> -Michael
>>
>>> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> this is just a short information about the upcoming Core
>>>> Update.
>>>>
>>>> Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug
>>>> fixes. It will appear on the testing tree shortly and I
>>>> *strongly* recommend to install the update as soon as possible
>>>> and to give it a good test.
>>>>
>>>> Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that
>>>> so that it would be very convenient if as many bugs can be
>>>> found as possible before the end of this week.
>>>>
>>>> We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
>>>>
>>>> See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog
>>>> will follow on the IPFire Planet as usual.
>>>>
>>>> Best, -Michael

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[Daniel Weismüller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1892 bytes --]

Hi Michael

As usual you're right. ;)

Here is what i found in /var/log/httpd/error_log

[Thu Nov 12 16:18:31 2015] [error] [client 192.168.55.108] can't exec : 
No such file or directory, referer: 
https://192.168.55.1:444/cgi-bin/mail.cgi
[Thu Nov 12 16:18:31 2015] [error] [client 192.168.55.108] error closing 
:  (exit 512), referer: https://192.168.55.1:444/cgi-bin/mail.cgi

I think there is already a bug for it.  See here 
https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10932

It is already closed but it seems that it is not fixed. So I reopened it.

- Daniel

Am 12.11.2015 um 20:14 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 16:27 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.
>>
>> If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank white
>> screen and nothing else.
>> No error, no logentry and no mail.
> There must be something in the logs. Could you please check what the
> reason is and if applicable open a bug? You can probably assign this to
> Alex.
>
>> Is there someone else with that problem?
>>
>> - Daniel
> -Michael
>
>> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this is just a short information about the upcoming Core Update.
>>>
>>> Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug fixes. It
>>> will appear on the testing tree shortly and I *strongly* recommend
>>> to
>>> install the update as soon as possible and to give it a good test.
>>>
>>> Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that so
>>> that it
>>> would be very convenient if as many bugs can be found as possible
>>> before the end of this week.
>>>
>>> We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
>>>
>>> See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog will
>>> follow
>>> on the IPFire Planet as usual.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> -Michael

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[R. W. Rodolico]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1744 bytes --]

I ran a test on my machine. Daniel, can you verify the following happens
on yours also?

[root(a)dd-router httpd]# find / -name sendmail
/usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sendmail
/usr/sbin/sendmail

[root(a)dd-router httpd]# ls -ablph /usr/sbin/sendmail
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 10 18:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail ->
/etc/alternatives/sendmail

[root(a)dd-router httpd]# ls /etc/alternatives
ls: cannot access /etc/alternatives: No such file or directory

basically, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symbolic link to
/etc/alternatives/sendmail, and /etc/alternatives does not exist.

Rod

On 11/12/2015 09:27 AM, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.
> 
> If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank white
> screen and nothing else.
> No error, no logentry and no mail.
> 
> Is there someone else with that problem?
> 
> - Daniel
> 
> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this is just a short information about the upcoming Core Update.
>>
>> Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug fixes. It
>> will appear on the testing tree shortly and I *strongly* recommend to
>> install the update as soon as possible and to give it a good test.
>>
>> Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that so that it
>> would be very convenient if as many bugs can be found as possible
>> before the end of this week.
>>
>> We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
>>
>> See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog will follow
>> on the IPFire Planet as usual.
>>
>> Best,
>> -Michael
> 

-- 
Rod Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465
214.827.2170
http://www.dailydata.net

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[Daniel Weismüller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2138 bytes --]

Here it is...

[root(a)ipfire ~]# find / -name sendmail
/usr/sbin/sendmail
/usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sendmail

[root(a)ipfire ~]# ls -ablph /usr/sbin/sendmail
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 11 01:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail -> 
/etc/alternatives/sendmail

[root(a)ipfire ~]# ls /etc/alternatives
ls: cannot access /etc/alternatives: No such file or directory
[root(a)ipfire ~]#

- Daniel

Am 13.11.2015 um 05:48 schrieb R. W. Rodolico:
> I ran a test on my machine. Daniel, can you verify the following happens
> on yours also?
>
> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# find / -name sendmail
> /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sendmail
> /usr/sbin/sendmail
>
> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# ls -ablph /usr/sbin/sendmail
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 10 18:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail ->
> /etc/alternatives/sendmail
>
> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# ls /etc/alternatives
> ls: cannot access /etc/alternatives: No such file or directory
>
> basically, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symbolic link to
> /etc/alternatives/sendmail, and /etc/alternatives does not exist.
>
> Rod
>
> On 11/12/2015 09:27 AM, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.
>>
>> If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank white
>> screen and nothing else.
>> No error, no logentry and no mail.
>>
>> Is there someone else with that problem?
>>
>> - Daniel
>>
>> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this is just a short information about the upcoming Core Update.
>>>
>>> Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug fixes. It
>>> will appear on the testing tree shortly and I *strongly* recommend to
>>> install the update as soon as possible and to give it a good test.
>>>
>>> Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that so that it
>>> would be very convenient if as many bugs can be found as possible
>>> before the end of this week.
>>>
>>> We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
>>>
>>> See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog will follow
>>> on the IPFire Planet as usual.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> -Michael

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[Alexander Marx]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2768 bytes --]

Hi!
i installed core 94, configured dma as it should and it was working. 
Then i upgraded to core 95 and all settings are exactly the same and 
testmail is working.
Can someone please give a complete procedure to reproduce this error?

Which Version did you use as a base? Did you install core 94 from iso or 
as an Update from core 93?
Did DMA work BEFORE you upgraded to core 95?

We faced a Bug when upgrading from core 93 to core 94, but that BUG 
should already be fixed.
thank you



Am 13.11.2015 um 08:55 schrieb Daniel Weismüller:
> Here it is...
>
> [root(a)ipfire ~]# find / -name sendmail
> /usr/sbin/sendmail
> /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sendmail
>
> [root(a)ipfire ~]# ls -ablph /usr/sbin/sendmail
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 11 01:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail -> 
> /etc/alternatives/sendmail
>
> [root(a)ipfire ~]# ls /etc/alternatives
> ls: cannot access /etc/alternatives: No such file or directory
> [root(a)ipfire ~]#
>
> - Daniel
>
> Am 13.11.2015 um 05:48 schrieb R. W. Rodolico:
>> I ran a test on my machine. Daniel, can you verify the following happens
>> on yours also?
>>
>> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# find / -name sendmail
>> /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sendmail
>> /usr/sbin/sendmail
>>
>> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# ls -ablph /usr/sbin/sendmail
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 10 18:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail ->
>> /etc/alternatives/sendmail
>>
>> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# ls /etc/alternatives
>> ls: cannot access /etc/alternatives: No such file or directory
>>
>> basically, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symbolic link to
>> /etc/alternatives/sendmail, and /etc/alternatives does not exist.
>>
>> Rod
>>
>> On 11/12/2015 09:27 AM, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.
>>>
>>> If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank white
>>> screen and nothing else.
>>> No error, no logentry and no mail.
>>>
>>> Is there someone else with that problem?
>>>
>>> - Daniel
>>>
>>> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> this is just a short information about the upcoming Core Update.
>>>>
>>>> Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug fixes. It
>>>> will appear on the testing tree shortly and I *strongly* recommend to
>>>> install the update as soon as possible and to give it a good test.
>>>>
>>>> Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that so 
>>>> that it
>>>> would be very convenient if as many bugs can be found as possible
>>>> before the end of this week.
>>>>
>>>> We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
>>>>
>>>> See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog will follow
>>>> on the IPFire Planet as usual.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> -Michael
>

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[R. W. Rodolico]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3679 bytes --]

Alex,

I updated the bug report (10932). I believe this occurred because Daniel
and I were part of the update from 93-94 and we never installed the
patch (in my case I know I didn't). In my case, it was working but only
because I had created a symlink from sendmail directly to sendmail.dma
and most likely during the upgrade to 95 that symlink was corrected to
/etc/alternatives (which did not exist).

Unless someone else sees this, I don't think it is a true bug anymore.
Instead, it is an artifact left over from testing the 93-94 upgrade. I
used almost the same machine, clean installed 94, then upgraded to 95
and everything is working correctly.

Rod

On 11/13/2015 02:57 AM, Alexander Marx wrote:
> Hi!
> i installed core 94, configured dma as it should and it was working.
> Then i upgraded to core 95 and all settings are exactly the same and
> testmail is working.
> Can someone please give a complete procedure to reproduce this error?
> 
> Which Version did you use as a base? Did you install core 94 from iso or
> as an Update from core 93?
> Did DMA work BEFORE you upgraded to core 95?
> 
> We faced a Bug when upgrading from core 93 to core 94, but that BUG
> should already be fixed.
> thank you
> 
> 
> 
> Am 13.11.2015 um 08:55 schrieb Daniel Weismüller:
>> Here it is...
>>
>> [root(a)ipfire ~]# find / -name sendmail
>> /usr/sbin/sendmail
>> /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sendmail
>>
>> [root(a)ipfire ~]# ls -ablph /usr/sbin/sendmail
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 11 01:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail ->
>> /etc/alternatives/sendmail
>>
>> [root(a)ipfire ~]# ls /etc/alternatives
>> ls: cannot access /etc/alternatives: No such file or directory
>> [root(a)ipfire ~]#
>>
>> - Daniel
>>
>> Am 13.11.2015 um 05:48 schrieb R. W. Rodolico:
>>> I ran a test on my machine. Daniel, can you verify the following happens
>>> on yours also?
>>>
>>> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# find / -name sendmail
>>> /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sendmail
>>> /usr/sbin/sendmail
>>>
>>> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# ls -ablph /usr/sbin/sendmail
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 10 18:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail ->
>>> /etc/alternatives/sendmail
>>>
>>> [root(a)dd-router httpd]# ls /etc/alternatives
>>> ls: cannot access /etc/alternatives: No such file or directory
>>>
>>> basically, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symbolic link to
>>> /etc/alternatives/sendmail, and /etc/alternatives does not exist.
>>>
>>> Rod
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2015 09:27 AM, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Core Update 95 installed succesfully without any abnormalities.
>>>>
>>>> If I try to send a testmail via the mail.cgi I'll get a blank white
>>>> screen and nothing else.
>>>> No error, no logentry and no mail.
>>>>
>>>> Is there someone else with that problem?
>>>>
>>>> - Daniel
>>>>
>>>> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Michael Tremer:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> this is just a short information about the upcoming Core Update.
>>>>>
>>>>> Core Update 95 has been branched and will only accept bug fixes. It
>>>>> will appear on the testing tree shortly and I *strongly* recommend to
>>>>> install the update as soon as possible and to give it a good test.
>>>>>
>>>>> Arne will be away for the next week and some time after that so
>>>>> that it
>>>>> would be very convenient if as many bugs can be found as possible
>>>>> before the end of this week.
>>>>>
>>>>> We would like to release this update in a bit over two weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> See the Git repository for changes. A summarized changelog will follow
>>>>> on the IPFire Planet as usual.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> -Michael
>>
> 

-- 
Rod Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465
214.827.2170
http://www.dailydata.net

Re: Core Update 95 release schedule

[Jan Lentfer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2506 bytes --]

Somehow for me DNS is broken after the upgrade due to that pakfire does 
not work for me anymore.

16:54:53	pakfire:	PAKFIRE INFO: IPFire Pakfire 2.17.1 started!
16:54:53	pakfire:	CRYPTO INFO: Checking GnuPG Database
16:54:53	pakfire:	CRYPTO INFO: Database is okay
16:54:53	pakfire:	Sending my uuid: f44161ec-6510-4217-a155-ac14c5fc45f5
16:54:53	pakfire:	DOWNLOAD STARTED: 
counter.py?ver=2.17.1&uuid=f44161ec-6510-4217-a155-ac14c5fc45f 5
16:54:53	pakfire:	DOWNLOAD INFO: Host: pakfire.ipfire.org (HTTP) - File: 
counter.py?ver=2.17.1&uui d=f44161ec-6510-4217-a155-ac14c5fc45f5
16:54:53	pakfire:	DOWNLOAD INFO: HTTP-Status-Code: 500 - 500 Can't 
connect to pakfire.ipfire.org:8 0 (Bad hostname 'pakfire.ipfire.org')
16:54:53	pakfire:	Giving up: There was no chance to get the file 
counter.py?ver=2.17.1
16:54:53	pakfire:	MIRROR INFO: server-list.db is 638 seconds old. - 
DEBUG: noforce
16:54:53	pakfire:	DB INFO: packages_list.db is 92 seconds old. - DEBUG: 
noforce
16:54:53	pakfire:	CORE INFO: core-list.db is 92 seconds old. - DEBUG: 
noforce
16:54:53	pakfire:	PAKFIRE INFO: Pakfire has finished. Closing.


Host aurora is my ipfire installation. Everything works except looking 
up anysthing on ipfire.org, but ipfire.org lookups work when I query my 
DNS directly.

[root(a)aurora ~]# nslookup pakfire.ipfire.org
Server:         127.0.0.1
Address:        127.0.0.1#53

** server can't find pakfire.ipfire.org: SERVFAIL

[root(a)aurora ~]#
[root(a)aurora ~]# nslookup monster.lan.net
Server:         127.0.0.1
Address:        127.0.0.1#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:   monster.lan.net
Address: 10.94.76.11

[root(a)aurora ~]# nslookup www.spiegel.de
Server:         127.0.0.1
Address:        127.0.0.1#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:   www.spiegel.de
Address: 62.138.116.25

[root(a)aurora ~]#
[root(a)aurora ~]# nslookup www.ipfire.org
Server:         127.0.0.1
Address:        127.0.0.1#53

** server can't find www.ipfire.org: SERVFAIL

[root(a)aurora ~]#
[root(a)aurora ~]#
[root(a)aurora ~]# nslookup www.ipfire.org 10.94.76.181
Server:         10.94.76.181
Address:        10.94.76.181#53

Non-authoritative answer:
www.ipfire.org  canonical name = web01.ipfire.org.
Name:   web01.ipfire.org
Address: 178.63.73.246

[root(a)aurora ~]# nslookup pakfire.ipfire.org 10.94.76.181
Server:         10.94.76.181
Address:        10.94.76.181#53

Non-authoritative answer:
pakfire.ipfire.org      canonical name = web01-v4only.ipfire.org.
Name:   web01-v4only.ipfire.org
Address: 178.63.73.246