From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Fischer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: dnsmasq 2.75, including latest patches from 2015-12-24 Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:12:59 +0100 Message-ID: <568AEE6B.20109@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: <568AD259.3090904@dailydata.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0046768899662210170==" List-Id: --===============0046768899662210170== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, (I just "replied", list is now included.) Just for testing I think it would be worth a try with the suggested nameservers. Best, Matthias On 04.01.2016 21:13, R. W. Rodolico wrote: > Did you intend to do this off list? > Anyway, yes, I changed my nameservers. Previously, I used > 209.244.0.3 > 8.8.4.4 > > Which are level3.net and google, respectively. I didn't realize I was > using them :( > > Rod > > On 01/04/2016 11:24 AM, Matthias Fischer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03.01.2016 11:45, R. W. Rodolico wrote: >>> I just had it break on me. It lasted longer than the last time, but >>> dnsmasq just broke on me. >> >> [****!] >> >> >>> Basically, the same error message. This is dnsmasq_275_2015_12_24 which >>> I got from Matthias, I think. >> >> Yep. The exact same version is running here without any problems... >> >> I couldn't reproduce these crashes. Not even once. Right now I'm testing >> the next patches (sad to say, they won't compile). >> >> Would you mind to test this version with different nameservers from >> germany? I'm using the DNS Servers from https://dns.watch/index and >> never had any problems since then... >> >> Best, >> Matthias >> > --===============0046768899662210170==--