public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "R. W. Rodolico" <rodo@dailydata.net>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: The parallel projects (was Re: Apache 2.4 and php 5.6 test branch)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:23:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A32A6C.7090801@dailydata.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453515577.585.94.camel@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3643 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Understood.

On 01/22/2016 08:19 PM, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> so to put an end to this discussion (I think we have heard the
> opinions of everyone who this matters to), I would like to quickly
> recap and propose some actions we/I will now take.
> 
> So Marcel (aka gocart on the forums) has unfortunately contacted
> me privately because he doesn't want to discuss this on this
> mailing list for several reasons. He allowed me to publish the
> content of that conversation. I won't post the full text (it is in
> German any way), but pick some points that I found interesting.
> 
> The first of the reasons why he is not taking part in this
> conversation on this list is that there is a language barrier and
> secondly he finds this list "useless". The latter one of these left
> me quite puzzled. I expressed my disappointment about that and
> asked again that he would think about it but there has been no
> reply.
> 
> He agrees that there have to be rules when many people are working 
> together, but he does not accept ours. Even having this debate
> about these rules is a waste of time to him. It actually is, but
> rules have to be set up and and they have to be challenged from
> time to time.
> 
> Upstreaming work is a matter of leaving it in a git repository
> until somebody takes over. He is refusing a discussion about his
> work.
> 
> Just to remind you: This was never about just him. There are other 
> parallel projects. He is just the only person who voiced himself a 
> little bit. The others didn't.
> 
> 
> So I come to my personal conclusion that I will just leave the
> stuff as it is. I won't talk with these people as there is clearly
> no point. I won't feel a bit responsible for what they are doing
> there.
> 
> If someone wants to take their stuff and post it to the list in an 
> orderly fashion that is something else. Maybe these people can
> agree that one member of the team is talking to the rest of the
> developers as a spokesman. I find that just silly, but there might
> be other ways.
> 
> For me, stuff happens on this list. Nowhere else. Period.
> 
> 
> The other consequence I am taking is to rename the development area
> on the forums. My first idea was to just get rid of it, but I guess
> people will be posting their stuff in other sub-forums then. So it
> will just be renamed to clearly state that this is *not* the place
> where development happens so that nobody can complain that "the
> developers" don't reply to their posts. There is this list. There
> is Bugzilla. These are the places to go.
> 
> 
> I hope that these changes will improve the situation. I am in no
> way trying to deter those contributors from contributing to this
> project. I am trying to do the opposite which is to steer them
> towards contributing their patches in a way that we can review
> them, improve them if necessary, and then merge them into the
> distribution so that IPFire becomes better. This process however
> needs to follow rules and it appears that we have to enforce those
> even more.
> 
> Feel free to comment on this, but please keep it short if you can 
> because I want to focus on other things. Just in case someone is 
> interested in the PMs from Marcel let me know and I will post
> them, too.
> 
> Best, -Michael
> 

- -- 
Rod Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465
214.827.2170
http://www.dailydata.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlajKmwACgkQuVY3UpYMlTTHHwCeKpc+dt23b2ptFpQqq3FVzhtL
QEUAnAi/p9VEt0SdJREp8RKF8/K66mw0
=ZufT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-23  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <56966461.3090401@ipfire.org>
2016-01-19  1:16 ` Michael Tremer
2016-01-19 20:56   ` David J. Allen
2016-01-19 21:59     ` R. W. Rodolico
2016-01-19 22:11       ` Larsen
2016-01-19 23:25       ` Michael Tremer
2016-01-20  1:02         ` R. W. Rodolico
2016-01-20 14:58           ` Michael Tremer
2016-01-19 23:05     ` Michael Tremer
2016-01-23  2:19       ` Michael Tremer
2016-01-23  7:23         ` R. W. Rodolico [this message]
     [not found] <C88CCB4C-7B6E-458A-9BCF-7A1AD320F99D@gmail.com>
2016-01-19 11:28 ` Michael Tremer
     [not found] <24C74A6E-65D3-471E-8F83-9EFABBD57DC4@ipfire.org>
2016-01-19 11:41 ` Michael Tremer
2016-01-20  7:50   ` ummeegge
2016-01-20 23:25     ` Michael Tremer
     [not found] <1453291479.2200.0@smtp.1und1.de>
2016-01-20 23:43 ` Michael Tremer
     [not found] <25A90500-70D9-4904-A434-6DE9AB6007FA@gmail.com>
2016-01-23 11:33 ` Michael Tremer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A32A6C.7090801@dailydata.net \
    --to=rodo@dailydata.net \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox