public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: rsync 3.2.0
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:28:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56d13dd2-c24b-bfc4-ec5e-e32fdda6b4d4@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CD641D70-4AA4-4AE0-8168-EAB88198F831@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1780 bytes --]

Hi,

On 25.06.2020 10:54, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> On 20 Jun 2020, at 16:09, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> rsync 3.2.0 is out and I just had time...

In fact, I'm at 3.2.1. See below.

>> In order to use the new xxhash checksum support and zstd compression,
>> the corresponding kernel modules would need to be activated. Do we want
>> or need these?
> 
> You won’t need kernel modules for this. You simply need the relevant libraries.

Ok. I wasn't sure. I found some 'zstd's in the rootfiles and thought we
would need these.

> I have packaged those for IPFire 3 and they are easy to build and have no further dependencies. So I would recommend to at least add zstd.

I am at it.

> https://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-3.x.git;a=blob;f=rsync/rsync.nm;h=528dcfc0a377bc770a45a8f88af00079eb26dc93;hb=b40cdb8c182d8b4aa05c6e23cc67118c4aa4853c
> https://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-3.x.git;a=blob;f=zstd/zstd.nm;h=e5afd342b9ad2ae0c0f394116ef2dfddea670413;hb=8bcac5c8cda49b91fe68bef64c3ad975b80a43ca

Thats exactly what I needed - thanks - I'll take a look.

> 
>> 
>> For now, I disabled both with these configure options:
>> 
>> ...
>> 	--disable-xxhash \
>> 	--disable-zstd
>> ...
>> 
>> Do we want (would someone use) the new 'rsync-ssl'-script? On a firewall!?
> 
> I tried to find out what this is useful for. It doesn’t harm us and calls openssl. So I would just leave it in there.

Ok.

Please note:

'rsync 3.2.1' just came out. I'm testing - and working on 'zstd 1.4.5'
(weekend, I think).

If you want, we could skip 3.2.0 => no need to merge this patch.

I could mark 3.2.0 as 'superseded' in patchwork and we'll go straight to
3.2.1.

Opinions?

Best,
Matthias

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-25 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-20 15:09 Matthias Fischer
2020-06-25  8:54 ` Michael Tremer
2020-06-25 15:28   ` Matthias Fischer [this message]
2020-06-25 15:35     ` Michael Tremer
2020-06-25 15:56       ` Matthias Fischer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56d13dd2-c24b-bfc4-ec5e-e32fdda6b4d4@ipfire.org \
    --to=matthias.fischer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox