From: "R. W. Rodolico" <rodo@dailydata.net>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Guardian 2 - Correction
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 14:34:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578A8C3E.6050408@dailydata.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <578A804D.1080206@dailydata.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4126 bytes --]
Second paragraph should be
... I generally
tail /var/log/httpd/error.log
On 07/16/2016 01:43 PM, R. W. Rodolico wrote:
> I saw the same issue and filed a bug report
> (https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11146).
>
> When something like this pops up, I generally
> https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11146
> immediately after the problem shows up; that usually gives some
> indication of the problem.
>
> As Matthias says, it is a permissions issue on the configuration file
> directory. Either manually create the files (with correct ownership and
> permission) or change ownership/permission on the directory. Then, you
> have a nice, pretty GUI.
>
> I was able to efficiently block myself from the GUI after that. Since I
> don't know anything about how to test Snort, I'm having problems getting
> it to block automatically, but that is another issue.
>
> Rod
>
> On 07/16/2016 09:19 AM, Mark Coolen wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused about that. Why would 2.0-002 be newer than 2.0-010?
>> There's a 2.0-012 under 'old approach' but those files have an older
>> timestamp. The 2.0-002 is a tarball, but the 2.0-010 is an ipfire
>> package as are the 'dependancies'. I've used Guardian 2 several times in
>> the past by just extracting according to the instructions on stevee's
>> ;--) page, but that doesn't seem to work with the 2.0-002 tarball. I
>> just get a completely blank page in the GUI.
>> How do we test?
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Matthias Fischer
>> <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org <mailto:matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ok, next.
>>
>> Am I right assuming that the '2.0-002'-version at
>> http://people.ipfire.org/~stevee/guardian-2.0/ plus
>> http://people.ipfire.org/~stevee/guardian-2.0/packages/dependencies/ is
>> the latest!?
>>
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>>
>> On 16.07.2016 04:03, Mark Coolen wrote:
>> > I'm willing to test it as well. I take it the instructions from
>> > http://planet.ipfire.org/post/introducing-guardian-2-0-for-ipfire
>> are still
>> > good?
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 8:23 PM, R. W. Rodolico
>> <rodo(a)dailydata.net <mailto:rodo(a)dailydata.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> Tell me what I need to do to test Guardian. I've never installed it,
>> but I am doing it now.
>>
>> Rod
>>
>> On 07/15/2016 05:00 AM, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>
>>> even if you have a conversation on the phone, please try keeping us
>>> in the loop.
>>
>>> So the key points of what I know:
>>
>>> * A release is targeted for core update 104
>>
>>> * There are a few changes required so that re-blocking a host after
>>> it has been manually unblocked allows this host the configured
>>> number of tries again and not only one.
>>
>>> * Many more testers are required since feedback is really low at
>>> this point.
>>
>>> Did I get this right? What is the ETA for a set of patches on the
>>> mailing list?
>>
>>> What is the plan to engage more testers?
>>
>>> Best, -Michael
>>
>>> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 14:36 +0200, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>>>> Hi Stevee I know you are very busy and working hard on the this.
>>>> But if you want to release the new Guardian 2 with Core 104 we
>>>> still need to do some work and it must be tested! So please tell
>>>> us something about the new guardian2 and the state of your work.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we find more testers here on the list.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile I've talked with Michael about the state which I know
>>>> of the guardian2 and we both go confirm that the list of blocked
>>>> IPs which runs in the background isn't a good idea. Please let us
>>>> talk by phone about it again.
>>>>
>>>> - Daniel
>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _ _ _ ___ _
>> )\/,) ___ __ )L, )) __ __ )) __ _ _
>> ((`(( ((_( (| ((\ ((__((_)((_)(( (('((\(
>
--
Rod Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465
214.827.2170
http://www.dailydata.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-16 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CACOO0z-ZmvxauaLjrv5nLX_kctaPcbMB1nGNZy02iT=E5FDNEA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-07-16 15:12 ` Guardian 2 Matthias Fischer
2016-07-16 18:43 ` R. W. Rodolico
2016-07-16 19:34 ` R. W. Rodolico [this message]
2016-07-16 20:10 ` Guardian 2 - Correction Matthias Fischer
2016-07-16 22:26 ` R. W. Rodolico
2016-07-16 23:19 ` R. W. Rodolico
2016-07-18 14:03 ` Stefan Schantl
[not found] <CACOO0z_XpLEKp3E7M1n6t6cgmVmDNO7OGzUaVN-pr9b7rOwWaQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-07-17 0:56 ` R. W. Rodolico
2016-07-17 5:43 ` Matthias Fischer
[not found] <CACOO0z_2rhPGhW_rCe46VMCgWTT_4jLxMwSJZoAheY5ouiNt=g@mail.gmail.com>
2016-07-17 13:57 ` Matthias Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578A8C3E.6050408@dailydata.net \
--to=rodo@dailydata.net \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox