From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Test of cleanup branch
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:44:17 +0100
Message-ID: <5FCCF7CF-3438-4BCF-998A-FDA7ACD9A9A9@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <4808f27e-fd3a-426d-b17a-ebbae267510b@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3811349256821095057=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============3811349256821095057==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Adolf,

Thank you for getting back on this so quickly.

I suppose this also means that the ISO in the next branch boots just fine, to=
o?

Best,
-Michael

> On 25 Jul 2024, at 09:07, Adolf Belka <adolf.belka(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Michael,
>=20
> I installed CU188 from the nightly onto a vm system and looked though all t=
he WUI pages and everything looked fine.
>=20
> I then restored a CU187 backup from my testing and then checked the OpenVPN=
 RW and N2N. Both worked fine with no problems. Also the logging for that all=
 worked with no problems.
>=20
> Also checked out the IPS, IP Blocklists, Firewall groups and rules, DNS ...
>=20
> Everything I have looked at shows no impact from the cleanup branch changes=
. It looks good to me.
>=20
> Of course good for others to also evaluate.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Adolf.
>=20


--===============3811349256821095057==--