From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Logwatch (randomly) skipping days => Feature!?
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 18:28:47 +0200
Message-ID: <5aedb6d5-5944-09eb-3e67-784e4ff40cca@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <74ecb2e2-9fa9-9564-58e8-7e8ad2730907@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2915798558241892107=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============2915798558241892107==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

For testing, I changed the conjob for logwatch from to "03 0 * * * " but
tonight 'logwatch' did it again:

"No (or only partial) logs exist for the day queried:
/var/log/logwatch/2019-03-31 could not be opened."

So it took some time, but the bug still exists.

Any suggestions? I think, I should open a bug report...

Best,
Matthias

On 18.02.2019 14:14, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On 18.02.2019 13:38, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> I do not think that you have two reports in the larger file.
>>=20
>> In the cronjob line the file is being overwritten (>) and not appended (>>=
).
>=20
> I see.
>=20
>> Is it possible that this conflicts with the logrotate job that is launched=
 at the same time and logwatch tries to read files that are being rotated awa=
y?
>=20
> This was my first suspicion. After changing the start time of the
> 'logwatch'-job the error did not occur again until now. I'll wait and watch.
>=20
> Best,
> Matthias
>=20
>> -Michael
>>=20
>>> On 17 Feb 2019, at 15:01, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org=
> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Hi,
>>>=20
>>> On 17.02.2019 15:42, Tom Rymes wrote:
>>>> Is this a ticking issue where one log has two days=E2=80=99 data and the=
 other is empty?
>>>=20
>>> [Correction:
>>> Of course I meant '.../2019-01-26' ;-) ]
>>>=20
>>> Looking an it - could be the case. The log created on 2019-01-28 is
>>> significantly bigger:
>>>=20
>>> ***SNIP***
>>> ...
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  43698 Jan 24 00:01 2019-01-23
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  56469 Jan 25 00:01 2019-01-24
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  57936 Jan 26 00:01 2019-01-25
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root      0 Jan 27 00:01 2019-01-26
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 114650 Jan 28 00:01 2019-01-27
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  40121 Jan 29 00:01 2019-01-28
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  38220 Jan 30 00:01 2019-01-29
>>> ...
>>> ***SNAP***
>>>=20
>>> But what can I do about this? For now, I changed running time to
>>> "03 0 * * *".
>>>=20
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>>>=20
>>>>> On Feb 17, 2019, at 4:22 AM, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfir=
e.org> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I discovered something weird:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> From time to time 'logwatch' does not create a daily log.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> E.g.:
>>>>> The file '/var/log/logwatch/2019-14-26' exists, but size =3D 0 Bytes.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> The same happened yesterday with '/var/log/logwatch/2019-02-16':
>>>>> 0 Bytes.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> After running...
>>>>>=20
>>>>> /usr/local/bin/logwatch > /var/log/logwatch/`date -I -d yesterday`; \
>>>>> LOGWATCH_KEEP=3D$(sed -ne 's/^LOGWATCH_KEEP=3D\([0-9]\+\)$/\1/p'
>>>>> /var/ipfire/logging/settings); \
>>>>> find /var/log/logwatch/ -ctime +${LOGWATCH_KEEP=3D56} -exec rm -f '{}' =
';'
>>>>>=20
>>>>> ...manually from console, file was created, everything looks ok.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> 1. Can anyone confirm?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> 2. With which parameter could I change the starting time "01 0 * * *" so
>>>>> that this doesn't happen again? I'm searching, but can't find a grip on
>>>>> this...
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20


--===============2915798558241892107==--