Hello Michael,

thanks for your reply.

> Hello,
> 
> Err, yes, but what do we gain from dropping this?

Well, shipping a broken symlink did not seem to serve any purpose to me. Or were
you referring to not shipping /usr/bin/setarch?

Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller

> 
> Does it hurt us to be compatible with any general purpose distribution?
> 
> -Michael
> 
>> On 9 Jul 2022, at 14:37, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> This file points to /usr/bin/setarch, which we do not ship on any
>> architecture. As it serves no obvious purpose on IPFire installations,
>> we may as well not ship it entirely.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org>
>> ---
>> config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux | 2 +-
>> config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh       | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux b/config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux
>> index bd862b557..de78f65c2 100644
>> --- a/config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux
>> +++ b/config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux
>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ usr/bin/uclampset
>> usr/bin/uuidgen
>> usr/bin/uuidparse
>> #usr/bin/whereis
>> -usr/bin/x86_64
>> +#usr/bin/x86_64
>> #usr/include/blkid
>> #usr/include/blkid/blkid.h
>> #usr/include/libfdisk
>> diff --git a/config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh b/config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh
>> index e3f93df57..5d8903189 100644
>> --- a/config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh
>> +++ b/config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ rm -rvf \
>> 	/sbin/ifcfg \
>> 	/sbin/routef \
>> 	/sbin/rtpr \
>> +	/usr/bin/x86_64 \
>> 	/usr/lib/libbfd-2.36.* \
>> 	/usr/lib/libbind9-9.16.2* \
>> 	/usr/lib/libdnet* \
>> -- 
>> 2.35.3
>