From: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: rust: Update to 1.67 - wanted - useful? ;-)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:48:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <677e1a22-9ae2-42d7-d9d6-dd52f76c4bcf@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1CC61043-59FE-4AC9-817C-325F8E32B140@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2131 bytes --]
Hi,
On 29.01.2023 21:57, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> On 29 Jan 2023, at 18:18, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> right now I'm running a second clean build on current 'next'. Just to be
>> *absolutely* sure that this works.
>
> Great!
Second build ran through without errors.
>> But: while uploading the sources of 'rust 1.67', I'm getting "out of
>> disk space" errors.
>>
>> Seems that ~1.4GB source code is bit too much for git.ipfire.org ath the
>> moment, sorry.
>
> Yes, the partition for the source ran out of space.
>
> I increased the size, but 1.4G per release seems to be very excessive…
Yep. I was a bit puzzled, too.
1.65: 1.3GB, 1.67: 1.4GB - where will this end up when 2.0 comes out!?
Estimated: ~4.7GB!? ;-)
I'm ready to push - shall I?
Best,
Matthias
> -Michael
>
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>>
>> On 29.01.2023 15:27, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>> Hello Matthias,
>>>
>>>> On 28 Jan 2023, at 14:37, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> after the last drama I hardly dare to ask, but: are we interested in a
>>>> 'rust 1.67' update, now that the update to 'rust 1.65' is in 'next'?
>>>
>>> Generally yes, because we should follow upstream as close as possible when there is such a fast pace from upstream. I am sure there are plenty of bug fixes and security fixes included in this release.
>>>
>>> However, with the massive amount of work it takes, I believe that we do not need to jump to every single release. We have other things to take care of after all.
>>>
>>> So, if it is an easy jump, feel free to send patches. :)
>>>
>>> Thank you for all your effort. I know how much pain packaging Rust is.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> -Michael
>>>
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> =>
>>>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1670-2023-01-26
>>>>
>>>> First tests and build (I was curious): only lfs and rootfile updates are
>>>> needed.
>>>>
>>>> *duckandcover*... ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Matthias
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-28 13:37 Matthias Fischer
2023-01-29 14:27 ` Michael Tremer
2023-01-29 17:18 ` Matthias Fischer
2023-01-29 20:57 ` Michael Tremer
2023-01-30 17:48 ` Matthias Fischer [this message]
2023-01-30 18:34 ` Michael Tremer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=677e1a22-9ae2-42d7-d9d6-dd52f76c4bcf@ipfire.org \
--to=matthias.fischer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox