public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] squid 4.5: latest patches (01-09)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:17:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <698edfe9-bc63-b233-6bf2-e39c6d20a627@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C6BBD54A-56E6-4F0B-ADB6-6FB918E23264@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3016 bytes --]

Hi,

On 25.02.2019 11:34, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> I think it is best to only follow the releases from upstream.

Besides, I'm closely watching
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/ (daily) and I never
read of problems in IPFire forum related to the (bug) patches published
there.

I'll stick with the major releases. Less work, less noise here. ;-)

> I am sure that they will release a new version when there were important changes and that will save us from doing some extra work with the patches.

ACK.

FYI:

In the testing queue (running here):

squid 4.6
bind 9.11.5-P4
tar 1.32
mc 4.8.22

So if anyone is working on these - I got them already running. Will
probably push them on weekend.

Best,
Matthias

> Best,
> -Michael
> 
>> On 24 Feb 2019, at 10:20, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Please note:
>> 
>> This patch is superseded - I'm working/testing with 'squid 4.6'.
>> 
>> So please don't merge this one. ;-)
>> 
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>> 
>> On 05.02.2019 21:58, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>> Okay, so we should not use that switch then.
>>> 
>>> Also just ignore the BCP 177 message.
>>> 
>>> -Michael
>>> 
>>>> On 5 Feb 2019, at 17:37, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> On 05.02.2019 13:02, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 4 Feb 2019, at 17:54, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For details see:
>>>>>> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> 	cd $(DIR_APP) && autoreconf -vfi
>>>>>> @@ -91,7 +100,7 @@ $(TARGET) : $(patsubst %,$(DIR_DL)/%,$(objects))
>>>>>> 		--disable-kqueue \
>>>>>> 		--disable-esi \
>>>>>> 		--disable-arch-native \
>>>>>> -		--enable-ipv6 \
>>>>>> +		--disable-ipv6 \
>>>>>> 		--enable-poll \
>>>>>> 		--enable-ident-lookups \
>>>>>> 		--enable-storeio=aufs,diskd,ufs \
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wait, didn’t the documentation say, that they are going to remove this switch very soon?
>>>> 
>>>> Ups. Yes. This is 'deprecated' since a long time:
>>>> 
>>>> https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2016-April/002046.html
>>>> 
>>>> "The --disable-ipv6 build option is now deprecated.
>>>> ...
>>>> Squid-3.5.7 and later will perform IPv6 availability tests on startup in
>>>> all builds.
>>>> 
>>>> - Where IPv6 is unavailable Squid will continue exactly as it would
>>>> have had the build option not been used.
>>>> 
>>>> These Squid can have the build option removed now."
>>>> 
>>>> (The error I described in the post above was not IPv6 related.)
>>>> 
>>>> For my part we could either leave this enabled (default) or remove this
>>>> option. The warning message concerning the "BCP 177 violation" while
>>>> starting 'squid' stays the same - no matter if IPv6 was disabled or
>>>> enabled in 'configure'.
>>>> 
>>>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Matthias
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2019-02-25 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-04 17:54 Matthias Fischer
2019-02-05 12:02 ` Michael Tremer
2019-02-05 17:37   ` Matthias Fischer
2019-02-05 20:58     ` Michael Tremer
2019-02-06 17:36       ` Matthias Fischer
2019-02-24 10:20       ` Matthias Fischer
2019-02-25 10:34         ` Michael Tremer
2019-02-25 18:17           ` Matthias Fischer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=698edfe9-bc63-b233-6bf2-e39c6d20a627@ipfire.org \
    --to=matthias.fischer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox