Hi,

I do not think that you have two reports in the larger file.

In the cronjob line the file is being overwritten (>) and not appended (>>).

Is it possible that this conflicts with the logrotate job that is launched at the same time and logwatch tries to read files that are being rotated away?

-Michael

> On 17 Feb 2019, at 15:01, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 17.02.2019 15:42, Tom Rymes wrote:
>> Is this a ticking issue where one log has two days’ data and the other is empty?
> 
> [Correction:
> Of course I meant '.../2019-01-26' ;-) ]
> 
> Looking an it - could be the case. The log created on 2019-01-28 is
> significantly bigger:
> 
> ***SNIP***
> ...
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  43698 Jan 24 00:01 2019-01-23
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  56469 Jan 25 00:01 2019-01-24
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  57936 Jan 26 00:01 2019-01-25
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root      0 Jan 27 00:01 2019-01-26
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 114650 Jan 28 00:01 2019-01-27
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  40121 Jan 29 00:01 2019-01-28
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  38220 Jan 30 00:01 2019-01-29
> ...
> ***SNAP***
> 
> But what can I do about this? For now, I changed running time to
> "03 0 * * *".
> 
> Best,
> Matthias
> 
>>> On Feb 17, 2019, at 4:22 AM, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I discovered something weird:
>>> 
>>> From time to time 'logwatch' does not create a daily log.
>>> 
>>> E.g.:
>>> The file '/var/log/logwatch/2019-14-26' exists, but size = 0 Bytes.
>>> 
>>> The same happened yesterday with '/var/log/logwatch/2019-02-16':
>>> 0 Bytes.
>>> 
>>> After running...
>>> 
>>> /usr/local/bin/logwatch > /var/log/logwatch/`date -I -d yesterday`; \
>>> LOGWATCH_KEEP=$(sed -ne 's/^LOGWATCH_KEEP=\([0-9]\+\)$/\1/p'
>>> /var/ipfire/logging/settings); \
>>> find /var/log/logwatch/ -ctime +${LOGWATCH_KEEP=56} -exec rm -f '{}' ';'
>>> 
>>> ...manually from console, file was created, everything looks ok.
>>> 
>>> 1. Can anyone confirm?
>>> 
>>> 2. With which parameter could I change the starting time "01 0 * * *" so
>>> that this doesn't happen again? I'm searching, but can't find a grip on
>>> this...
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>> 
>