public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Peter Müller" <peter.mueller@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:47:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <73a40462-7169-1828-2f84-d08739bdad1d@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BB90C5E9-09B6-4278-9F67-87D0A9D096D6@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1380 bytes --]

Hello Matthias, hello Michael,

looking at https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2022-February/007671.html,
it appears as if the commit in question never made it into the final release of Unbound 1.15.0,
so the issue should not appear with the productive version.

Unless I overlooked something, I would consider Unbound 1.15.0 to be ready for prime time. :-)

Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller

> Hello Matthias,
> 
> Yes, we should definitely wait before we introduce a known regression.
> 
> I do not see anything on the change log that would be *that* interesting for us that it would be worth it to break DoT.
> 
> Hopefully a patch will be available soon.
> 
> -Michael
> 
>> On 11 Feb 2022, at 08:58, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> please note - I'm working on 'unbound 1.15.0' which was published
>> yesterday, but it seems this version has some problems with DoT(?).
>>
>> See:
>> =>
>> https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2022-February/007669.html
>>
>> "It looks like with certain (dot?) configuration, 53/tcp becomes defunct
>> on this version of unbound".
>>
>> I'm testing - no problems so far - under MY environment (see attached
>> screenshot).
>>
>> Should we still wait?
>>
>> => Opinions!?
>>
>> Best,
>> Matthias<screenshot_dns_gui.png>
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2022-04-18 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <a1530bff-5130-5ab9-81e5-6cb6654c1690@ipfire.org>
2022-02-11  9:36 ` Michael Tremer
2022-04-18 20:47   ` Peter Müller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=73a40462-7169-1828-2f84-d08739bdad1d@ipfire.org \
    --to=peter.mueller@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox