public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations
       [not found] <a1530bff-5130-5ab9-81e5-6cb6654c1690@ipfire.org>
@ 2022-02-11  9:36 ` Michael Tremer
  2022-04-18 20:47   ` Peter Müller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tremer @ 2022-02-11  9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: development

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 917 bytes --]

Hello Matthias,

Yes, we should definitely wait before we introduce a known regression.

I do not see anything on the change log that would be *that* interesting for us that it would be worth it to break DoT.

Hopefully a patch will be available soon.

-Michael

> On 11 Feb 2022, at 08:58, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> please note - I'm working on 'unbound 1.15.0' which was published
> yesterday, but it seems this version has some problems with DoT(?).
> 
> See:
> =>
> https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2022-February/007669.html
> 
> "It looks like with certain (dot?) configuration, 53/tcp becomes defunct
> on this version of unbound".
> 
> I'm testing - no problems so far - under MY environment (see attached
> screenshot).
> 
> Should we still wait?
> 
> => Opinions!?
> 
> Best,
> Matthias<screenshot_dns_gui.png>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations
  2022-02-11  9:36 ` unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations Michael Tremer
@ 2022-04-18 20:47   ` Peter Müller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Müller @ 2022-04-18 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: development

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1380 bytes --]

Hello Matthias, hello Michael,

looking at https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2022-February/007671.html,
it appears as if the commit in question never made it into the final release of Unbound 1.15.0,
so the issue should not appear with the productive version.

Unless I overlooked something, I would consider Unbound 1.15.0 to be ready for prime time. :-)

Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller

> Hello Matthias,
> 
> Yes, we should definitely wait before we introduce a known regression.
> 
> I do not see anything on the change log that would be *that* interesting for us that it would be worth it to break DoT.
> 
> Hopefully a patch will be available soon.
> 
> -Michael
> 
>> On 11 Feb 2022, at 08:58, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> please note - I'm working on 'unbound 1.15.0' which was published
>> yesterday, but it seems this version has some problems with DoT(?).
>>
>> See:
>> =>
>> https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2022-February/007669.html
>>
>> "It looks like with certain (dot?) configuration, 53/tcp becomes defunct
>> on this version of unbound".
>>
>> I'm testing - no problems so far - under MY environment (see attached
>> screenshot).
>>
>> Should we still wait?
>>
>> => Opinions!?
>>
>> Best,
>> Matthias<screenshot_dns_gui.png>
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-18 20:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <a1530bff-5130-5ab9-81e5-6cb6654c1690@ipfire.org>
2022-02-11  9:36 ` unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations Michael Tremer
2022-04-18 20:47   ` Peter Müller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox