From: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Forcing DNS/NTP V2 - new approach
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 09:28:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73c3712d-2c60-fe92-1ddd-f0fee6ac67ac@ipfire.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1945 bytes --]
Hi,
since restarting the *whole* firewall through '/etc/rc.d/init.d/firewall
restart' as I did before is NOT an option, I'm thinking about another -
simpler way - to do this.
As Michael wrote "There are plenty of temporary rules that are being
created and which simply will get lost after restarting the firewall.
Mainly this affects IPsec, but also QoS."
For me - and of course for everybody who uses IPSec or QoS - this is a
showstopper. Saving the affected - temporary rules - is too complicated
(for me). I'm trying to make this as simple as possible.
So I'm thinking about separating the DNS/NTP-commands and use them in a
another init-file, apart from the firewall initscript.
I just want to "go out of the way". ;-)
As I see it, IPSec and QoS (e.g) would not be affected and furthermore
we would perhaps have the choice to control some other settings through
this file.
E.g., the settings from '/var/ipfire/optionsfw/settings' are processed
in various control files, see:
https://community.ipfire.org/t/forcing-all-dns-traffic-from-the-lan-to-the-firewall/3512/89
And perhaps that would give us the chance to tidy things up. Just a thought.
So what about using an 'optionsfw' initscript for the DNS/NTP rules?
This and *only* this file would be started through "Save and Restart' on
'optionsfw.cgi', using a new binary. As before, this would be
'optionsfwctrl(.c)', now just containing a call of
'/etc/rc.d/init.d/optionsfw'. Controlling other settings could be added
as needed. A complete firewall restart is NOT initiated.
In this init, the existence of the needed values is first checked, and
only processed if they exist (e.g.):
...
if [ -z "$DNS_FORCE_ON_GREEN" ] && [ "$DNS_FORCE_ON_GREEN" == "on" ]; then
...
The only affected chain is CUSTOMPREROUTING, so other
functionalities/chains (IPSec, QoS) should not be affected.
May I ask for your opinions? ;-)
Best,
Matthias
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-30 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-30 8:28 Matthias Fischer [this message]
2021-01-06 15:50 ` Stefan Schantl
2021-01-06 18:32 ` Matthias Fischer
2021-01-07 11:47 ` Michael Tremer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73c3712d-2c60-fe92-1ddd-f0fee6ac67ac@ipfire.org \
--to=matthias.fischer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox