Good morning Arne,

thanks for your reply.

Indeed, we both built an updater for this one - I guess I will just call you on the
phone next time, so there is no redundant work done. :-)

How should we proceed? Is the updated kernel a must criterion?

Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller


> Damn. I have tested and build the updater at weekend and added the new kernel. Now
> it is too large with the new changes...
> 
> Arne
> 
> 
> Am 2021-11-23 23:53, schrieb Peter Müller:
>> Hello Michael,
>> hello *,
>>
>> thanks for your reply.
>>
>> An updater has now been added, and should contain all necessary files,
>> and restarting
>> commands currently necessary. I will run a clean build again tomorrow,
>> and see if there
>> is anything missing.
>>
>> Since I bumped into many patches incorrectly flagged in Patchwork:
>> Could you grant me
>> the privileges necessary to edit patches other than my own? This would
>> make things more
>> straightforward, since orphaned patches could be tagged accordingly
>> without bothering
>> their author.
>>
>> Thanks, and best regards,
>> Peter Müller
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>> On 19 Nov 2021, at 06:44, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Good morning Arne,
>>>> good morning folks,
>>>>
>>>> as discussed at the latest monthly conference (https://wiki.ipfire.org/devel/telco/2021-11-01) and
>>>> on the phone a few weeks ago, I just wanted to inform everyone about the current state of affairs
>>>> of handling patches:
>>>>
>>>> To shed some load from Arne, who is currently mastering Core Updates, we agreed on me opening up
>>>> a temporary branch (ad-hoc named "temp-cXXX-development", where XXX stands for the number of the
>>>> upcoming Core Update in question) in my Git repository for IPFire 2.x. There, I will apply patches
>>>> being ready to go into the distribution, so whoever is in charge of an update can eventually merge
>>>> this branch.
>>>>
>>>> I will subsequently eat through Patchwork, starting with the most recent patches. Additional commits
>>>> required (for example, for shipping rootfiles) will be made if possible.
>>>>
>>>> @Arne: Please find the branch for Core Update 162 here: https://git.ipfire.org/?p=people/pmueller/ipfire-2.x.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/temp-c162-development
>>>> Let me know if there is anything wrong or dissatisfying, or some patches need to be reverted due
>>>> to an update becoming too big. Currently being on the go, it does not contain much yet, but you'll
>>>> get the idea.
>>>
>>> Yes, where is the updater? Does it all still build?
>>>
>>> Merging the patches into a branch doesn’t take that much time, but building the update out of it is what is the important part.
>>>
>>> -Michael
>>>
>>>> @All: Unfortunately, I lack permissions in Patchwork to mark other people's patches as being
>>>> superseded (@Michael: Can/should we change this?), should I become aware of them. As always, it
>>>> would be a great help if everyone would periodically review his/her Patchwork list, and scrub
>>>> orphaned/dropped/rejected/superseded patches from it.
>>>>
>>>> As always, please drop me a line in case of questions or comments.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, and best regards,
>>>> Peter Müller
>>>