From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ummeegge <ummeegge@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Core 142 build error with dnsdist
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 14:03:49 +0200
Message-ID: <83df67daa4134e430d88b5a847a78a10398bcc26.camel@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <2C7B78D3-C486-4479-A5B8-3EAEDADF923A@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7478872143251356111=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============7478872143251356111==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 12:01 +0100 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> Hmm, the make file already has 2GB per process set up.
>=20
>=20
https://git.ipfire.org/?p=3Dipfire-2.x.git;a=3Dblob;f=3Dlfs/dnsdist;h=3D9f204=
0f16583e033f624e24415953396a4d9e526;hb=3DHEAD#l40
>=20
> So it will launch one compiler process per 2GB of memory. Obviously
> less than one isn=E2=80=99t possible.
>=20
> You can try filtering out =E2=80=9C-pipe=E2=80=9D from the CFLAGS and CXXFL=
AGS, so
> that the assembler will be stared after the compiler is done and not
> in parallel. That will also save a couple of megabytes, but probably
> not a massive lot.
OK, will give it may a try.

>=20
> In general I can recommend to add more memory to your build system.
> 4GB seems to be a bit of a sweet spot. More than that normally does
> not make any difference.
Yeah, will need a new machine for this since my good old JNC9C eats 3GB
max :-| . But may some day the Weihnachtsmann comes via wormhole a
little earlier and funds some new hardware ;-) .

>=20
> Best,
> -Michael

Thanks. Best,

Erik

>=20
> > On 4 Apr 2020, at 16:03, ummeegge <ummeegge(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > Hi Michael,
> > that=C2=B4s my old build syste, with 2GB RAM
> >=20
https://fireinfo.ipfire.org/profile/72d11e77621ec66ea75d39e3c9b10025e746e5af
> >=20
> >=20
> > Am Samstag, den 04.04.2020, 14:51 +0100 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> > > How much memory does your build system have?
> > >=20
> > > > On 4 Apr 2020, at 08:04, ummeegge <ummeegge(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> > > >=20
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > the current build delivers an error with dnsdist:
> > > >=20
> > > > dnsdist
> > > > (1.4.0)                                                       =20
> > > >    =20
> > > >                                                      [       17
> > > > ][
> > > > FAIL ]
> > > >=20
> > > >   -j [N], --jobs[=3DN]          Allow N jobs at once; infinite
> > > > jobs
> > > > with no arg.
> > > >   -k, --keep-going            Keep going when some targets
> > > > can't
> > > > be made.
> > > >   -l [N], --load-average[=3DN], --max-load[=3DN]
> > > >   Don't start multiple jobs unless load is below N.
> > > >   -L, --check-symlink-times   Use the latest mtime between
> > > > symlinks and target.
> > > >   -n, --just-print, --dry-run, --recon
> > > >   . . .
> > > >   Consider FILE to be infinitely new.
> > > >   --warn-undefined-variables  Warn when an undefined variable
> > > > is
> > > > referenced.
> > > >=20
> > > >   This program built for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> > > >   Report bugs to <bug-make(a)gnu.org>
> > > >   make: *** [dnsdist:84: /usr/src/log/dnsdist-1.4.0] Error 2
> > > >=20
> > > > ERROR: Building
> > > > dnsdist                                                       =20
> > > >    =20
> > > >                                                          [ FAIL
> > > > ]
> > > >=20
> > > > By commenting '$(MAKETUNING)' the build went through. Should it
> > > > prepare
> > > > a patch for this or is there may another solution ?
> > > >=20
> > > > Best,
> > > >=20
> > > > Erik
> > > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
>=20
>=20


--===============7478872143251356111==--