From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: New package for 'clamav 0.105.1(-2) necessary?
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 16:55:47 +0000
Message-ID: <84FC8188-7A20-49EF-95E4-4BC09A872000@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <e9920d0d-5dd9-5af7-0de6-25510c4bae8c@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7251333465456775447=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============7251333465456775447==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

What he said!

> On 7 Nov 2022, at 10:48, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello Matthias,
> 
> thanks for raising this.
> 
> Yes, please. Keep the package updates coming, highly appreciated. :-)
> 
> All the best,
> Peter Müller
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> short question, based on
>> https://blog.clamav.net/2022/10/new-packages-for-clamav-01037-01044.html
>> 
>> Excerpt:
>> "...there are several critical bugs in the JPEG and TIFF image
>> processing libraries in the original 0.105.1 source package. The known
>> issues were resolved in image-tiff version 0.7.4 and jpeg-decoder
>> version 0.3.0. The clamav-0.105.1-2.tar.gz source package includes the
>> updated libraries.
>> Linux/Unix package maintainers are encouraged to publish new revisions
>> of their own packages for ClamAV 0.105.1 to get these fixes. Anyone who
>> built ClamAV from the original clamav-0.105.1.tar.gz source package is
>> encouraged to reinstall from the newer source package."
>> 
>> Do we want an updated package?
>> 
>> Best,
>> Matthias


--===============7251333465456775447==--