public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl.conf: Turn on BPF JIT hardening, if the JIT is enabled
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:10:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <88495F26-CF50-49AB-B5A9-670C4250B0A0@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa7c0ee6-b190-cb21-0323-08ea97bb39bd@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2677 bytes --]

Hello,

I agree merging this, but we can only enable this on x86_64, aarch64 and armv5tel.

i586 does not support BPF_JIT and does not know this sysctl option.

Could you please submit an updated patch?

-Michael

> On 2 Apr 2021, at 20:37, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello Michael,
> 
> especially after https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2021-April/009804.html,
> I would really like to bring this up once more.
> 
> From my point of view, it is safe to turn on that sysctl, as no user should ever load
> anything into BPF directly on an IPFire 2.x machine, especially not if that abuses some
> JIT oddities.
> 
> At least on my semi-productive testing machine, this does not break anything I am aware of.
> 
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller
> 
> 
>> Hello Michael,
>> 
>>> Hi Peter,
>>> 
>>>> On 7 Jun 2020, at 18:02, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> This is recommended by the Kernel Self Protection Project, and although
>>>> we do not take advantage of the BPF JIT at this time, we should set this
>>>> nevertheless in order to avoid potential security vulnerabilities.
>>> 
>>> I do not really understand what you are trying to achieve here.
>> 
>> I am trying to achieve enabling of BPF JIT hardening.
>> 
>>> Please state more clearly *why* you think this is a useful change for IPFire.
>>> 
>>> As far as I am aware, the kernel internally uses BPF.
>> 
>> Yes, to my knowledge, this is exactly the point. The Kernel is using it, and
>> we should make sure it is properly hardened then. If this sysctl is helping,
>> I do not see a reason why not turning it on.
>> 
>> Thanks, and best regards,
>> Peter Müller
>> 
>>> -Michael
>>> 
>>> P.S. How the f*** is this not already the default in the Linux kernel? Performance only, eh?
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Fixes: #12384
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> config/etc/sysctl.conf | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/config/etc/sysctl.conf b/config/etc/sysctl.conf
>>>> index 7e7ebee44..3f4c828f9 100644
>>>> --- a/config/etc/sysctl.conf
>>>> +++ b/config/etc/sysctl.conf
>>>> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ kernel.dmesg_restrict = 1
>>>> fs.protected_symlinks = 1
>>>> fs.protected_hardlinks = 1
>>>> 
>>>> +# Turn on BPF JIT hardening, if the JIT is enabled.
>>>> +net.core.bpf_jit_harden = 2
>>>> +
>>>> # Minimal preemption granularity for CPU-bound tasks:
>>>> # (default: 1 msec#  (1 + ilog(ncpus)), units: nanoseconds)
>>>> kernel.sched_min_granularity_ns = 10000000
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.26.2
>>> 


      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-06 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-07 17:02 Peter Müller
2020-06-08  9:07 ` Michael Tremer
2020-06-09 18:00   ` Peter Müller
2021-04-02 19:37     ` Peter Müller
2021-04-06 10:10       ` Michael Tremer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=88495F26-CF50-49AB-B5A9-670C4250B0A0@ipfire.org \
    --to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox