Hello Michael, thanks for your reply. > Hello, > > I suppose this is coming from changing dracut. As discussed on the phone already, I don't think dracut is the root cause here, since the mount options are fine on systems running Core Update 168. Some change in Core Update 169 caused this issue. > Unless I am reading your diff wrong, those options have been added which is a good thing?! No, it is the other way round. Silly me screwed up the diff. :-/ Anyway, commit 54bd60b67b477e5d5814293a74086dff1c21ac69 addresses all of them except for /dev. I searched and was unable to find any component where /dev is (re)mounted in the way it is shown in the output of "mount". Do you have any ideas? Thanks, and best regards, Peter Müller > > -Michael > >> On 20 Jun 2022, at 21:34, Peter Müller wrote: >> >> Hello *, >> >> while pre-testing Core Update 169, it came to my attention that, for some reason, >> various mount options have changed since Core Update 168, lacking options such as >> "nodev", "noexec", "nosuid", which means a security downgrade. >> >> The complete delta is as follows: >> >> $ diff -Naur before after >> --- before 2022-06-20 20:04:32.436632074 +0000 >> +++ after 2022-06-20 20:04:34.500401575 +0000 >> @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ >> -devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000) >> +devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000) >> /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime) >> /dev/sda2 on /boot/efi type vfat (rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=437,iocharset=ascii,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro) >> /dev/sda4 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime) >> -devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,relatime,size=1963708k,nr_inodes=490927,mode=755) >> +devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,nosuid,noexec,size=1949992k,nr_inodes=487498,mode=755) >> efivarfs on /sys/firmware/efi/efivars type efivarfs (rw,relatime) >> none on /sys/fs/cgroup type cgroup2 (rw,relatime) >> -/proc on /proc type proc (rw,relatime) >> -/run on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=8192k,mode=755) >> -/sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,relatime) >> -tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,relatime) >> +proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) >> +sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) >> +tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec) >> +tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755) >> /var/lock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=8192k) >> >> I cannot recall of having this explicitly changed anywhere, and don't understand >> the root cause for this (unwanted) change. Could somebody please point me into the >> right direction? :-) >> >> Thanks in advance, and best regards, >> Peter Müller >