Hi Matthias, and thanks for not giving up in this topic and for your hard work to stay there actual also after one+ year. I do also think it is a good idea to clean up the language files even there are not only some doubles but also triples like e.g. ... 'delete' => 'Löschen', ... 'remove' => 'Löschen', ... 'fwdfw delete' => 'Löschen', .. but also really a lot´s of unused ones. backup.cgi: It seems that this CGI is one of the older ones, a unified design to the rest should give the WUI possibly more visual consistens in my opinion but the order of the icons makes also more sense in that way. onclick: yes/no confirmation has been often ask for in the forum (it s...s if you accidentially delete a VPN client or a backup) but as Tom Rymes said it already, even we have already (nearly) all CGIs patched, some of them would probably not need a deletion confirmation, a question arises then which one doesn´t ? Nice project contribution from you Matthias, thanks again. Best, Erik Am Sonntag, den 25.11.2018, 08:30 -0500 schrieb Tom Rymes: > Matthias, > > I can’t comment on everything, but I do know that I have consistently > been confused by the icons on the backup page. > > Confirmation dialogs seem good, so long as we don’t go overboard and > ask “are you sure” for every tiny action. > > Tom > > > On Nov 24, 2018, at 4:39 PM, Matthias Fischer < > > matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Something similar has been posted before ([PATCH] Cosmetics: New > > icons > > for backup.cgi), but unfortunately the discussion was not continued > > for > > very long. > > > > Triggered by: > > > > https://forum.ipfire.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=21372 > > > > and > > > > https://forum.ipfire.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=21882 > > > > I'd like to know whether there is any interest in developing this > > any > > further. In the meantime, patches were built for 'backup.cgi' which > > not > > only update the icons and their order of precedence for better > > readability and usability. In an additional step, the 'delete' > > icons got > > 'onclick'-confirmation boxes (by Erik!) to prevent accidental > > deletions. > > > > Another step could be to add this confirmation to other CGIs. This > > additional query could prevent some trouble in the future as it > > happened > > to the original poster of the second link above. He accidentally > > deleted > > an OVPN client. No query... I'm already testing this functionality > > in > > other contexts (e.g., firewall rules, dhcp, hosts) and it works. > > > > And the last question: each current lang file contains up to ~600 > > unused > > translation strings. These are summing up to about 5000 strings > > which > > are not used or duplicates and could be deleted. Current size of > > all > > lang files is 1.2MB - we actually need about 900KB. A current patch > > can > > be found here: > > > > https://git.ipfire.org/?p=people/ummeegge/ipfire-2.x.git;a=commit;h=acbf3208e4a0d61c138d38326079a29b97545007 > > > > At the beginning of this year I built some patches for these unused > > strings and some other corrections > > (https://patchwork.ipfire.org/patch/1605/) but sadly got no > > reaction at > > all. Is there any interest, should we re-edit the unused > > translations? > > > > What do you think? Opinions and comments are welcome... > > > > Best, > > Matthias