Hi,

On 24.01.2018 13:42, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> since we don't use named the list of changes is somewhat small-ish.
> 
> I don't think we need to chase after every single release for bind as long as it
> isn't a security one. So a patched 9.11.x is fine with me as long as it is
> supported upstream.

Full ACK. I was a bit puzzled about this shortcoming update and the long
lists of changes indicate extensive adjustments.

[By the way: It happened as I thought. It won't build with our current
settings, 'Devel' just stopped. I'll give him a pause...]

> Anyways since this is a .0 release, it probably makes sense to wait a little
> until someone else has found the nasty bugs.

;-)

Ok, that is similar to my - second - thought.

Thanks for quick answer! ;-)

Best,
Matthias

> 
> Best,
> -Michael
> 
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 12:49 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> About a week ago I uploaded 'bind 9.11.2-p1', today version '9.12.0' was
>> released. Hm.
>> 
>> For details see:
>> http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.12.0/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.12.0.html
>> 
>> "BIND 9.12.0 is a new feature release of BIND. This document summarizes
>> new features and functional changes that have been introduced on this
>> branch, as well as features that have been deprecated or removed."
>> 
>> Could someone please take a look at these new/removed features and
>> changes? I'm not sure whether we can and want to implement this update
>> in view of the extensive changes.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>