From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: squid 5.1 gone stable
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:46:49 +0200
Message-ID: <991A5EE5-F2D6-4DC1-9A8A-D2DD7F2AA08C@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <3229c4dc-fa5a-6ebc-825b-3f8bb39b8109@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4267780644476651487=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============4267780644476651487==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

> On 5 Aug 2021, at 19:12, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> w=
rote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> On 02.08.2021 18:39, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> Hey,
>>=20
>> That sounds good.
>>=20
>> The change log lists a couple of changed and remove directives:
>>=20
>>  http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/squid-5.1-RELEASENOTES.html#s3
>>=20
>> Could you check if we are affected by any of this change?
>=20
> Building was ok - installing was ok. I checked the release notes and on
> the first glance didn't find anything we would need to worry about. Will
> take a closer look on weekend.
>=20
> But...:
>=20
> 5.1 is permanently complaining about filedescriptors and I couldn't find
> the reason for this so far. Even if I reduce the number during build to
> 32768 (this is supposedly his maximum), it keeps complaining:
>=20
> ...
> 2021/08/03 19:19:03 kid1| NOTICE: Could not increase the number of
> filedescriptors
> 2021/08/03 19:19:03 kid1| With 4096 file descriptors available
> ...

That must be the system=E2=80=99s limit then. If the process is being launche=
d as root, it should be able to change its own limits.

> And - it seems that it doesn't like 'privoxy'. Everything seems to
> work(!), no seen problems(!), but with 'squid 5.1' I'm getting these
> sporadic messages in 'cache_log':

We don=E2=80=99t have privoxy. Is that a custom thing that you are running?

> ...
> 2021/08/03 19:27:17 kid1| helperOpenServers: Starting 2/4
> 'redirect_wrapper' processes
>    current master transaction: master88
> 2021/08/03 19:27:33 kid1| TCP connection to 127.0.0.1/8118 failed
>    current master transaction: master53
> 2021/08/03 19:27:34 kid1| TCP connection to 127.0.0.1/8118 failed
>    current master transaction: master53
> 2021/08/03 19:27:56 kid1| TCP connection to 127.0.0.1/8118 failed
>    current master transaction: master53
> ...
> 2021/08/03 19:59:34 kid1| TCP connection to 127.0.0.1/8118 failed
>    current master transaction: master53
> 2021/08/03 19:59:34 kid1| Detected DEAD Parent: privoxy
>    current master transaction: master53
> 2021/08/03 19:59:34 kid1| Detected REVIVED Parent: privoxy
>    current master transaction: master53
> 2021/08/03 19:59:34 kid1| TCP connection to 127.0.0.1/8118 failed
>    current master transaction: master53
> ...
>=20
> Somehow I don't like this. Will report, if I find the reason.
>=20
> Best,
> Matthias
>=20
>=20
>> -Michael
>>=20
>>> On 2 Aug 2021, at 17:12, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org>=
 wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Hi,
>>>=20
>>> for the records...
>>>=20
>>> 5.1 has gone stable:
>>>=20
>>> =3D> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/
>>>=20
>>> Excerpt from changelog:
>>> "Changes in squid-5.1 (01 Aug 2021):
>>>=20
>>> 	- Bug 4696: Fix leaky String move assignment operator
>>> 	- Fix ACL-related reconfiguration memory leak
>>> 	- Fix SSL-Bump reconfiguration leaking public key memory
>>> 	- Fix build on RISC-V
>>> 	- Fix build on Ubuntu 21.04
>>>=20
>>> Changes in squid-5.0.7 (04 Jul 2021):
>>>=20
>>> 	- Fix a helper logging issues
>>> 	- Fix some helper connection issues
>>> 	- Cleanup: remove much unused code
>>> 	- ... and all fixes from 4.16
>>> ..."
>>>=20
>>> I'm at it.
>>>=20
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>>>=20
>>=20
>=20


--===============4267780644476651487==--