Oh no, we should of course ship setarch or drop x86_64. Either or the other.

I missed that we were talking about a *broken* symlink here.

> On 12 Jul 2022, at 11:44, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello Michael,
> 
> thanks for your reply.
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Err, yes, but what do we gain from dropping this?
> 
> Well, shipping a broken symlink did not seem to serve any purpose to me. Or were
> you referring to not shipping /usr/bin/setarch?
> 
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller
> 
>> 
>> Does it hurt us to be compatible with any general purpose distribution?
>> 
>> -Michael
>> 
>>> On 9 Jul 2022, at 14:37, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This file points to /usr/bin/setarch, which we do not ship on any
>>> architecture. As it serves no obvious purpose on IPFire installations,
>>> we may as well not ship it entirely.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org>
>>> ---
>>> config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux | 2 +-
>>> config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh       | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux b/config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux
>>> index bd862b557..de78f65c2 100644
>>> --- a/config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux
>>> +++ b/config/rootfiles/common/x86_64/util-linux
>>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ usr/bin/uclampset
>>> usr/bin/uuidgen
>>> usr/bin/uuidparse
>>> #usr/bin/whereis
>>> -usr/bin/x86_64
>>> +#usr/bin/x86_64
>>> #usr/include/blkid
>>> #usr/include/blkid/blkid.h
>>> #usr/include/libfdisk
>>> diff --git a/config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh b/config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh
>>> index e3f93df57..5d8903189 100644
>>> --- a/config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh
>>> +++ b/config/rootfiles/core/170/update.sh
>>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ rm -rvf \
>>> 	/sbin/ifcfg \
>>> 	/sbin/routef \
>>> 	/sbin/rtpr \
>>> +	/usr/bin/x86_64 \
>>> 	/usr/lib/libbfd-2.36.* \
>>> 	/usr/lib/libbind9-9.16.2* \
>>> 	/usr/lib/libdnet* \
>>> -- 
>>> 2.35.3
>>