From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gjCgf0PFhz2xsf for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2026 11:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "YR2" (not verified)) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gjCgY54Ypz2xHP for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2026 11:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4gjCgY1tzDz2M; Sat, 20 Jun 2026 11:59:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003ed25519; t=1781956777; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vhoeI5h9Axqu7xSfJRKuSrxvEm6bb5b5e+t1vYy4raM=; b=ks8ebfugNh6ur5XIUuAoT6bI+fs3rxwaYINFzvqOG5f8V1JXe4SrFMxywSeO41fOMH8Mm6 b2pMyXRhT3RzZKDQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1781956777; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vhoeI5h9Axqu7xSfJRKuSrxvEm6bb5b5e+t1vYy4raM=; b=ooOlYslvJQnMUYrGRcaF55rXF8sFPmfXgUG/0bf2rLOYYkJR9DbkETW0p5TD7VGw+5rjFj LTwV0V71pse5TNJF1mDvc+UmJlVLP959yV3rZlGQ9p/53rZnXArCDQ5x9QzEH4fw77OSr2 bo8zPlV/W+4hHDAFIABuFwhzlzAZiZ/ZixEChGOPPKO5Yr79NhzllBMepnnKK64IQY3f3X cgIlq6ZovSbrxBzVYn06zb8byYE4WObi2cbv1TQn5nZjZgjlTyiNgt+N+UyVbRsL6h/mtS OAESVLEw7eh94noDmyGEj1aGKmfC7B9u5kctUu2qBX7tqw5LLuBR1VCwsljGzg== Message-ID: <9aacfcb3-28bd-4e9c-81be-87d5df2db2ca@ipfire.org> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 13:59:31 +0200 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: Sender: Mail-Followup-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Updating perl 5.36.0 => 5.42.2 - some questions To: development@lists.ipfire.org References: <2dd775e8-e645-43f2-8219-e79198e666e3@ipfire.org> <1D3FCBD1-16E5-450B-88A0-B27B1F337EDB@ipfire.org> <56142892-a026-4f3f-b446-f05153f87490@ipfire.org> <60287726-6a52-4c3d-af92-917f62d52759@ipfire.org> <0B8676F0-27B2-4DE2-BE12-301D2F827E4D@ipfire.org> <5d90be69-e026-477e-96c1-056235b202c2@ipfire.org> <0645F905-CBFC-4A53-9AD6-D0B86F43197B@ipfire.org> <6001b1cd-b5c7-4878-9d0e-cc8e43ea2346@ipfire.org> <9b768727-3a1c-47d5-b915-c882e7e543d7@ipfire.org> Content-Language: en-US Cc: "IPFire: Belka, Adolf" , "IPFire: Tremer, Michael" From: Matthias Fischer In-Reply-To: <9b768727-3a1c-47d5-b915-c882e7e543d7@ipfire.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 20.06.2026 13:43, Adolf Belka wrote: > Hallo Matthias, Hi Adolf, > Sorry for late reply. I am a bit tied up with other things that are > keeping me busy at the moment. > > On 18/06/2026 13:56, Matthias Fischer wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On 16.06.2026 13:49, Michael Tremer wrote: >>> No worries, I wasn’t particularly quick with my response. >>> >>> What you sent looks good to me. I will reply to those emails once I review them. >> >> No problem, take your time. But since I was warned that building could >> be ok, but starting the firewall (e.g.) could run into errors, I set up >> my - offline - testmachine and couldn't find any (starting) errors. >> >> But: could 'someone' (Adolf(!?) ;-) ), install this build with this perl >> update and test it *online*? I don't know if this makes a really *big* >> difference, but I would feel better... > > Yes, I will have a go at this but it might not be till the week after next. > ... No problem, take your time...its too warm for anything anyway... ;-) In the meantime I did a few tests with my - offline - testmachine, which included restoring my firewall rules from Core 202 on a fresh built Core 204. Installation showed no errors and no seen problems on console or in the logs. Only green [OK]s... ;-) E.g., running 'rules.pl' in '/usr/lib/firewall' produced no errors. Best Matthias