From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Advice with adding RPS/RFS for PPP connections Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 10:36:25 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8772763335520402611==" List-Id: --===============8772763335520402611== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Adam, Thank you for getting in touch. > On 29 May 2020, at 21:18, Adam Jaremko wr= ote: >=20 > I've been doing RPS/RFS in my own shell scripts for some time and also impl= emented primitive support into the web UI but I'm very much a perl novice sin= ce my last real usage was in the 90's. What did you change in your scripts? > First and foremost, would it be relevant to add such support in an official= capacity? Generally I would say yes. Does it come with any downsides? I am not aware that anyone ran into resource issues here, because PPP connect= ions are usually rather slow (up to 100 MBit/s). But we would probably gain s= ome throughput by better utilisation of the load-balancing on the IPS, etc. > Second, is there any guidelines to accessing the filesytem with the scripts= ? I ask because my non thorough browsing of the code only revealed the use of= readhash, whereas I would need to poke and prod at procfs to work with compl= ex CPU affinity per queue. What are you doing here? Are you assigning a processor to a queue using that = script? > I can submit a review patch of my primitive implementation (non NUMA) where= in it's the same CPU affinity used across each queue using nproc and some che= ck boxes just to get feedback and a start in the right direction. >=20 > Thanks, > AJ -Michael --===============8772763335520402611==--