From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dFzn43rtCz32fr for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [IPv6:2001:678:b28::25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R12" (verified OK)) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dFzn11C3Qz2xYD for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4dFzn02c12zYc; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:43:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003ed25519; t=1764067396; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=a5sBFgsCmTcaTGKDLXQH5QLv3Ciqai1xj3A5l1a09h8=; b=Z6eLlAYyI5UfW1nYXGHiqochDCO7809v0qBi0WD5OsLYUs2opeC1tf0RNi9vxX0pWXib94 kkGbuM5aW3e41KDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1764067396; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=a5sBFgsCmTcaTGKDLXQH5QLv3Ciqai1xj3A5l1a09h8=; b=rCQbh78egz4C2d5/8aVXxBLLq7KKIyagshLalWgmXYsfnH91+rhA4k24W+Sm1V4HGaiQou lZxxjXAy+kEUc6LXEeBmjUrjMDKcupx3/SNrrvYSS3Zoq7gnwm7uusEkPOl4QqyOv0S4p9 cJwtO2Ozw4GUyDi0u17aJ8VUoSleb2DZt2HPycSbr9DoxPKtifJrY/b3E9XGGfhkpgTAxV 4BXqWKWJkbKAD33EBhhZ2nwOdQDIMzIn7gQkVJuie2HobyC0sjQ4RvEv5lQUBnIEXZhHo9 5PA+GZG5Sk0WF5zreDkNG5pVi22qae60BCIDUYtqDYSlAGRu2HYKYBefnR+Ffg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: Sender: Mail-Followup-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Core 199 Feedback From: Michael Tremer In-Reply-To: <19ab15ebf80.27e7.cac9d3ffac9e24d09d20af05166fd73b@ipfire.org> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:43:15 +0000 Cc: development@lists.ipfire.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <19ab15ebf80.27e7.cac9d3ffac9e24d09d20af05166fd73b@ipfire.org> To: Stefan Schantl Hello Stefan, Thank you for the feedback. The testing release announcement is just going out now: = https://www.ipfire.org/blog/ipfire-2-29-core-update-199-is-available-for-t= esting So far, I am not aware of any regressions, but we shall see this very = soon when we have some more feedback from the community. I was hopefully to have another update in testing before Christmas, but = I suppose the timeline does not allow this. So we should still ensure = that we are able to release this well before Christmas so that we = don=E2=80=99t give admins a last-minute update job. So, please, test, test, test! -Michael > On 23 Nov 2025, at 15:39, Stefan Schantl = wrote: >=20 > Hello developers, >=20 > today I upgraded my productive system to the latest development = version > of core update 199. >=20 > As far as I can see, there are no bigger issues in the update. >=20 > The process run's smooth and without any problems. >=20 > The system proper came up during reboot and also the connection to the > internet via QMI has been established successfull again. >=20 > The IDS is working and reporting properly. > IPSec Net-to-Net connections are established again and I can process > data through it. >=20 > The LLDPD service did not come up after the first reboot and also the > previous selected option to enable the service and the choosen > description was gone dure an overwrite of the settings file in > /var/ipfire/lldp. Thats totaly okay for me because I had manually > installed and tested the feature, any in my personal opinion a very > limited amount of other testers may be affected by this too. >=20 > That are the first test results / feedback for now. >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > -Stefan