* Re: unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations [not found] <a1530bff-5130-5ab9-81e5-6cb6654c1690@ipfire.org> @ 2022-02-11 9:36 ` Michael Tremer 2022-04-18 20:47 ` Peter Müller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Michael Tremer @ 2022-02-11 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 917 bytes --] Hello Matthias, Yes, we should definitely wait before we introduce a known regression. I do not see anything on the change log that would be *that* interesting for us that it would be worth it to break DoT. Hopefully a patch will be available soon. -Michael > On 11 Feb 2022, at 08:58, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > please note - I'm working on 'unbound 1.15.0' which was published > yesterday, but it seems this version has some problems with DoT(?). > > See: > => > https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2022-February/007669.html > > "It looks like with certain (dot?) configuration, 53/tcp becomes defunct > on this version of unbound". > > I'm testing - no problems so far - under MY environment (see attached > screenshot). > > Should we still wait? > > => Opinions!? > > Best, > Matthias<screenshot_dns_gui.png> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations 2022-02-11 9:36 ` unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations Michael Tremer @ 2022-04-18 20:47 ` Peter Müller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Peter Müller @ 2022-04-18 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1380 bytes --] Hello Matthias, hello Michael, looking at https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2022-February/007671.html, it appears as if the commit in question never made it into the final release of Unbound 1.15.0, so the issue should not appear with the productive version. Unless I overlooked something, I would consider Unbound 1.15.0 to be ready for prime time. :-) Thanks, and best regards, Peter Müller > Hello Matthias, > > Yes, we should definitely wait before we introduce a known regression. > > I do not see anything on the change log that would be *that* interesting for us that it would be worth it to break DoT. > > Hopefully a patch will be available soon. > > -Michael > >> On 11 Feb 2022, at 08:58, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> please note - I'm working on 'unbound 1.15.0' which was published >> yesterday, but it seems this version has some problems with DoT(?). >> >> See: >> => >> https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2022-February/007669.html >> >> "It looks like with certain (dot?) configuration, 53/tcp becomes defunct >> on this version of unbound". >> >> I'm testing - no problems so far - under MY environment (see attached >> screenshot). >> >> Should we still wait? >> >> => Opinions!? >> >> Best, >> Matthias<screenshot_dns_gui.png> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-18 20:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <a1530bff-5130-5ab9-81e5-6cb6654c1690@ipfire.org> 2022-02-11 9:36 ` unbound 1.15.0 - problems with certain DoT(?) configurations Michael Tremer 2022-04-18 20:47 ` Peter Müller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox