From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Net-DNS 0.47 vs. 1.25
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:57:05 +0100
Message-ID: <BCE1240D-2548-43B2-85C3-B166CFB92A4D@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <7f16c27e-3333-541f-9439-f199d127edbc@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0853395732035102235=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============0853395732035102235==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

> On 28 Jun 2020, at 19:54, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> is there a specific reason why we're still using 'Net-DNS 0.47', dated
> 01.04.2004?

No specific reason that I am aware of.

Please send patches :)

-Michael

> I built the current version (1.25, 26.06.2020) today, together with
> 'digest-hmac 1.03' and 'digest-sha1 2.13'. Especially the changelog for
> Net-DNS is really huge. After some rootfile adjustments all of them
> compiled without errors.
>=20
> But what made me wonder:
> Net-DNS didn't use the path .../xxxMACHINExxx-linux-thread-multi/...
> anymore, except for .../xxxMACHINExxx-linux-thread-multi/auto/...
>=20
> Could we use these updates? Or did I miss something?
>=20
> Opinions?
>=20
> Best,
> Matthias


--===============0853395732035102235==--