public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Pending package updates
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:25:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BD4805A6-D27E-4FED-89EC-14A6C1847AA9@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a37bfccb-90c8-6fa8-7e90-133e5c106b71@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1700 bytes --]

Hello,

> On 1 Sep 2020, at 19:22, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello *,
> 
> some rather important packages within IPFire 2.x are in need of being updated:
> - Strongswan 5.9.0
> - Postfix 3.5.7
> - libnetfilter_queue 1.0.5
> - iptables 1.8.5
> - libnetfilter_conntrack 1.0.8
> - conntrack-tools 1.4.6

Why are all these urgent updates?

I could not find any security-related issues in those packages and we are mostly one version behind. Strongswan was just released days ago and interesting features for us have been added.

> Since IPFire 2.x currently refuses to build on my workstation ("kernel too old", running
> OpenSuSE Leap 15.1), I cannot take care of those until I found some spare time to undergo
> a distribution upgrade, which probably does not happen before mid-September.

Yes, since we rebased the toolchain we require kernel 4.14:

  https://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-2.x.git;a=blob;f=lfs/glibc;h=802c372a904bf283fe2d3bd26b220d058b7fa2fe;hb=HEAD#l67

I changed it so that our version of glibc does not ship any old compatibility stuff that we do not need because IPFire itself is on 4.14 for years and as far as I knew any major distribution is on a more recent release.

Is this a common thing now and we need to downgrade? Any reason why you are not on the latest release of OpenSUSE Leap? 15.2 is out for some now.

> Is somebody else currently in luxury of being capable to build IPFire 2.x?

LOL Luxury

> If yes,
> might I ask that person to have a look at those packages, so we can ship them in
> Core Update 150? :-)
> 
> 1001 thanks in advance.
> 
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller

-Michael

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-02 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-01 18:22 Peter Müller
2020-09-01 21:01 ` Adolf Belka
2020-09-02 13:26   ` Michael Tremer
2020-09-02 13:42     ` Adolf Belka
2020-09-02 14:24     ` Adolf Belka
2020-09-02 15:36       ` Michael Tremer
2020-09-02 16:02         ` Matthias Fischer
2020-09-02 18:27         ` Matthias Fischer
2020-09-03  8:14           ` Adolf Belka
2020-09-03  8:23             ` Adolf Belka
2020-09-04 15:46               ` Michael Tremer
2020-09-05 14:09                 ` Adolf Belka
2020-09-07 11:33                 ` Adolf Belka
2020-09-07 13:16                   ` Adolf Belka
2020-09-02 13:25 ` Michael Tremer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BD4805A6-D27E-4FED-89EC-14A6C1847AA9@ipfire.org \
    --to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox