Hello Robin, Thanks for your email. I have seen your patches and I had hoped that somebody else would jump on it and give it a good review. My priority was indeed lying on getting the current update together and a couple of other things I am working on. > On 7 Apr 2021, at 16:39, Robin Roevens wrote: > > Hello > > It would be nice to have my zabbix_agentd update in this core update > too, which I provided at the start of previous week and seems to be > requested by a community member > (https://community.ipfire.org/t/zabbix-agent-on-stable-release/3636) > since October. > > And of course as a newbie here I can't wait for my submission to be > reviewed/included. But that should of course not be the reason to try > to squeeze it in this update. And apart from that, other than the fact > that the current version of zabbix_agentd is very old (august 2019), I > don't see any sudden urgent reasons to really have this package > included in update 156 as it already was not updated for so long.. > And I understand, seeing how much patches where submitted here in the > meantime, that the priorities currently are not set on some arbitrary > addon package like zabbix_agentd. Yes this is old. So thank you for looking into this. > So I guess it can wait for 157. > > I also noticed that in the meantime there is a Zabbix Agent v5.0.10 > (LTS) available, so I will re-submit my patchset shortly upgrading > current 4.2.6 to 5.0.10. And then hopefully have it included in 157? > Unless you still see a possibility to have it included in 156? :-) I won’t promise anything, but if I find some time I will review the patches and then we will see. -Michael > Regards > > Robin > > Michael Tremer schreef op wo 07-04-2021 om 16:04 [+0100]: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to formally close Core Update 156 as soon as possible to >> merge it into “master” and release it to a wider audience for testing. >> >> Does anyone have any changes that *must* be in this update? >> >> I have the following things on my list: >> >> * Dropping macvtap support: This is broken and I do not think that we >> would need this because we have bridges. Please review my proposed >> patch: >> https://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/2021-April/009858.html >> >> * Jonatan wanted to drop the other templates for the web UI >> >> * Peter has some sysctl changes >> >> Apart from that I would like to move our attention to testing this >> update and collecting patches for the next update. Core Update 156 is >> already quite large (15 MB compressed on x86_64) and so I would reject >> any larger changes unless really necessary. >> >> Lots of thanks to Adolf for putting in so many hours to update all >> these packages that have received so little love in the past. >> Especially Perl is one of those which take ages and ages :) >> >> Best, >> -Michael > > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke > inhoud door MailScanner en lijkt schoon te zijn. >