From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rymes To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Launching our new website Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2024 20:47:32 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <61E4C11A-CA80-41BF-BDB6-4A72F0759B10@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0939572585118612269==" List-Id: --===============0939572585118612269== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Jan 6, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Michael Tremer wr= ote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHello Tom, >=20 > Thank you for your feedback! >=20 >> On 4 Jan 2024, at 23:44, Tom Rymes wrote: >>=20 >> I really like it at first glance, though the red used in the banner on thi= s page (and I think it=E2=80=99s all over the place, I just didn=E2=80=99t co= nfirm) is too close to magenta to my eyes. It=E2=80=99s bright, but more trop= ical flower than fire, IMHO (it clashes a bit with the fire video on the home= page). >=20 > Is it a bad thing to be close to magenta? Not at all, it=E2=80=99s the juxtaposition of the video and the color that cl= ashed, in my opinion. The two aren=E2=80=99t near each other on the homepage, but if you load the h= omepage and then click on another page, the magenta is right where the video = was, so they=E2=80=99re adjacent while on different pages, in a way. > What I did get as negative feedback before was that the red is quite bright= (as in: burns your eyes). I use Apple devices which have generally good colo= ur representation and this feedback came from people that didn=E2=80=99t have= calibrated screens (brightness and contrast up all the way) This is a bit of an issue, I suppose, but less so. My observation was more of= a clash between the magenta and the fire colors. Magenta is often a bit inte= nse, but maybe that just means it shouldn=E2=80=99t be in big, broad patches = covering large sections of screen? I=E2=80=99ll leave that for the experts! Tom --===============0939572585118612269==--