Agreed.

> On 18 Jan 2022, at 21:22, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello Michael,
> 
> thanks for your reply.
> 
> Since I already put that patchset into my temporary development branch for Core Update 164,
> I will work on a dedicated patch for renaming the variables instead of reverting these and
> submit a second version of the patchset.

Don’t merge prematurely :)

> 
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller
> 
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>>> On 8 Jan 2022, at 11:43, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello Michael,
>>> 
>>>> You will always drop any packets sent to this chain, but you won’t always log them.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this what you intended?
>>> 
>>> yes. "LOGSPOOFEDMARTIAN" would have been better indeed; currently, we also have things
>>> like "DROPNEWNOTSYN", which is actually just an option for toggling logging of such
>>> packets.
>>> 
>>> Should I update the misleading "DROP*" variables as well to keep things consistent?
>> 
>> Yes. I would say so. I like things when they are tidy.
>> 
>> -Michael
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks, and best regards,
>>> Peter Müller
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>>> On 18 Dec 2021, at 13:48, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Traffic from and to 127.0.0.0/8 must only appear on the loopback
>>>>> interface, never on any other interface. This ensures offending packets
>>>>> are logged, and the loopback interface cannot be abused for processing
>>>>> traffic from and to any other networks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> src/initscripts/system/firewall | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> diff --git a/src/initscripts/system/firewall b/src/initscripts/system/firewall
>>>>> index cc5baa292..1c62c6e2c 100644
>>>>> --- a/src/initscripts/system/firewall
>>>>> +++ b/src/initscripts/system/firewall
>>>>> @@ -80,6 +80,14 @@ iptables_init() {
>>>>> 	fi
>>>>> 	iptables -A NEWNOTSYN  -j DROP -m comment --comment "DROP_NEWNOTSYN"
>>>>> 
>>>>> +	# Log and subsequently drop spoofed packets or "martians", arriving from sources
>>>>> +	# on interfaces where we don't expect them
>>>>> +	iptables -N SPOOFED_MARTIAN
>>>>> +	if [ "$DROPSPOOFEDMARTIAN" == "on" ]; then
>>>> 
>>>> DROP? Shouldn’t the variable be called LOGSPOOFEDMARTIAN?
>>>> 
>>>> You will always drop any packets sent to this chain, but you won’t always log them.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this what you intended?
>>>> 
>>>>> +		iptables -A SPOOFED_MARTIAN  -m limit --limit 10/second -j LOG  --log-prefix "DROP_SPOOFED_MARTIAN "
>>>>> +	fi
>>>>> +	iptables -A SPOOFED_MARTIAN -j DROP -m comment --comment "DROP_SPOOFED_MARTIAN"
>>>>> +
>>>>> 	# Chain to contain all the rules relating to bad TCP flags
>>>>> 	iptables -N BADTCP
>>>>> 
>>>>> @@ -177,14 +185,18 @@ iptables_init() {
>>>>> 	iptables -A INPUT -j ICMPINPUT
>>>>> 	iptables -A ICMPINPUT -p icmp --icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT
>>>>> 
>>>>> -	# Accept everything on loopback
>>>>> +	# Accept everything on loopback if source/destination is loopback space...
>>>>> 	iptables -N LOOPBACK
>>>>> -	iptables -A LOOPBACK -i lo -j ACCEPT
>>>>> -	iptables -A LOOPBACK -o lo -j ACCEPT
>>>>> +	iptables -A LOOPBACK -i lo -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j ACCEPT
>>>>> +	iptables -A LOOPBACK -o lo -d 127.0.0.0/8 -j ACCEPT
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	# ... and drop everything else on the loopback interface, since no other traffic should appear there
>>>>> +	iptables -A LOOPBACK -i lo -j SPOOFED_MARTIAN
>>>>> +	iptables -A LOOPBACK -o lo -j SPOOFED_MARTIAN
>>>>> 
>>>>> -	# Filter all packets with loopback addresses on non-loopback interfaces.
>>>>> -	iptables -A LOOPBACK -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>>>>> -	iptables -A LOOPBACK -d 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>>>>> +	# Filter all packets with loopback addresses on non-loopback interfaces (spoofed)
>>>>> +	iptables -A LOOPBACK -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j SPOOFED_MARTIAN
>>>>> +	iptables -A LOOPBACK -d 127.0.0.0/8 -j SPOOFED_MARTIAN
>>>>> 
>>>>> 	for i in INPUT FORWARD OUTPUT; do
>>>>> 		iptables -A ${i} -j LOOPBACK
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.26.2
>>>> 
>>