From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nano: Update to 5.9 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3526004260343837318==" List-Id: --===============3526004260343837318== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, > On 10 Oct 2021, at 16:15, Tom Rymes wrote: >=20 > I much prefer nano, as it=E2=80=99s intuitive, so I don=E2=80=99t have to t= hink to use it. If I forget what a command is, it=E2=80=99s at the bottom of = the screen. With vim, I have the remember =E2=80=9Cwait, how do I get into ed= iting mode? And if I want to save a file, how do I do that again? Crap. Bette= r Google a tutorial.=E2=80=9D Funny. I feel like that about nano. Impossible to use because it has loads of= weird keyboard shortcuts. I use VIM without thinking about it :) > Sure, if I used it more, it would become second nature, but I don=E2=80=99t= , so as more of an admin (and less of a developer) that doesn=E2=80=99t spend= lots of time in console editors, nano is nice. >=20 > Having said that, I don=E2=80=99t see the need to include it. Whenever I in= stall a new system, I run a pakfire command to install nano, ncftp, telnet (f= or administering old Cisco IP phones), wlanap, and I forget what else. No big= whoop, and how often does one install a new system? Ncftp? Is FTP still alive anywhere? -Michael > Tom >=20 >> On Oct 10, 2021, at 8:55 AM, Michael Tremer = wrote: >>=20 >> =EF=BB=BFHello, >>=20 >> We have (or had) a couple of editors and I am quite against shipping them = all. >>=20 >> Everyone has their favourites, and there will always be another one. >>=20 >> What is wrong with vim? >>=20 >> -Michael >>=20 >>> On 9 Oct 2021, at 22:07, Jon Murphy wrote: >>>=20 >>> All, >>>=20 >>> Is it possible to move `nano` from addon to core? It is SOOOOO much easi= er to use than vim. >>>=20 >>> I understand it is an easy installed addon but it seems like it really be= longs in "core". >>>=20 >>> Jon >>>=20 >>>>> On Oct 9, 2021, at 5:56 AM, Adolf Belka wrot= e: >>>>=20 >>>> Reviewed-by: Adolf Belka >>>>=20 >>>> On 08/10/2021 19:22, Matthias Fischer wrote: >>>>> For details see: >>>>> https://www.nano-editor.org/news.php >>>>>=20 >>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fischer >>>>> --- >>>>> lfs/nano | 6 +++--- >>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>>>=20 >>>>> diff --git a/lfs/nano b/lfs/nano >>>>> index 3bb7806aa..237dfab20 100644 >>>>> --- a/lfs/nano >>>>> +++ b/lfs/nano >>>>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ >>>>> include Config >>>>> -VER =3D 5.8 >>>>> +VER =3D 5.9 >>>>> THISAPP =3D nano-$(VER) >>>>> DL_FILE =3D $(THISAPP).tar.xz >>>>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ DL_FROM =3D $(URL_IPFIRE) >>>>> DIR_APP =3D $(DIR_SRC)/$(THISAPP) >>>>> TARGET =3D $(DIR_INFO)/$(THISAPP) >>>>> PROG =3D nano >>>>> -PAK_VER =3D 38 >>>>> +PAK_VER =3D 39 >>>>> DEPS =3D "" >>>>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ objects =3D $(DL_FILE) >>>>> $(DL_FILE) =3D $(DL_FROM)/$(DL_FILE) >>>>> -$(DL_FILE)_MD5 =3D d2249e3dd108c830df00efd7c1b79d86 >>>>> +$(DL_FILE)_MD5 =3D 24b67a7a2e731d3a5ec6d154b4521d08 >>>>> install : $(TARGET) >>>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 --===============3526004260343837318==--