I can second this.

Why is fsck more obvious then “file system check”?

It is a more technical term which does not provide any more detail in my opinion.

-Michael

> On 18 Nov 2022, at 18:02, Tom Rymes <tom(a)rymes.net> wrote:
> 
> I'm  still confused by what a user might expect, OTHER than a fsck check?
> 
> On 11/18/2022 10:42 AM, Robin Roevens wrote:
>> Some users assume that "check filesystem" does more than just
>> trigger a simple "fsck" run. This patch changes the button label to avoid
>> confusion. - NL translation
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Roevens <robin.roevens(a)disroot.org>
>> ---
>>  langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> diff --git a/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl b/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>> index 4fd6955cc..ebac2754a 100644
>> --- a/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>> +++ b/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>> @@ -1804,6 +1804,7 @@
>>  'read list' => 'lijst met readonly hosts',
>>  'real address' => 'Echte adressen',
>>  'reboot' => 'Herstarten',
>> +'reboot fsck' => 'Herstart & start &lsquo;fsck&rsquo;',
>>  'reboot ask' => 'Herstarten?',
>>  'reboot question' => 'Extra vraag voor herstart en afsluiten',
>>  'reboot schedule' => 'Inplannen IPFire herstarts',