From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH] Rename misleading "check filesystem" reboot option NL translation
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:53:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D99CDF16-5051-475F-9F7D-4D22801DFF14@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <e5ded51b-e961-48eb-5e3b-c649847fe361@rymes.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1376626430842124939=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============1376626430842124939==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I can second this.

Why is fsck more obvious then =E2=80=9Cfile system check=E2=80=9D?

It is a more technical term which does not provide any more detail in my opin=
ion.

-Michael

> On 18 Nov 2022, at 18:02, Tom Rymes <tom(a)rymes.net> wrote:
>=20
> I'm  still confused by what a user might expect, OTHER than a fsck check?
>=20
> On 11/18/2022 10:42 AM, Robin Roevens wrote:
>> Some users assume that "check filesystem" does more than just
>> trigger a simple "fsck" run. This patch changes the button label to avoid
>> confusion. - NL translation
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Roevens <robin.roevens(a)disroot.org>
>> ---
>>  langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> diff --git a/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl b/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>> index 4fd6955cc..ebac2754a 100644
>> --- a/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>> +++ b/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>> @@ -1804,6 +1804,7 @@
>>  'read list' =3D> 'lijst met readonly hosts',
>>  'real address' =3D> 'Echte adressen',
>>  'reboot' =3D> 'Herstarten',
>> +'reboot fsck' =3D> 'Herstart & start &lsquo;fsck&rsquo;',
>>  'reboot ask' =3D> 'Herstarten?',
>>  'reboot question' =3D> 'Extra vraag voor herstart en afsluiten',
>>  'reboot schedule' =3D> 'Inplannen IPFire herstarts',


--===============1376626430842124939==--