From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Testers wanted for patch "hostapd: make client isolation
 configurable via WebUI"
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:42:33 +0000
Message-ID: <E91DC01F-074B-42B5-98B2-3D98252FA1FF@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <1635685c-7113-17a8-c80f-f61630a7c2a6@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0905842126876684322=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============0905842126876684322==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey,

Please submit patches as usual to the list and mark then as RFC. It is easier=
 to comment on specific lines than.

But since the patch is quite simple, I guess it would work.

Translation is missing but I just saw that this is the case for the whole CGI=
 script :(

Best,
-Michael

> On 11 Mar 2019, at 20:23, Peter M=C3=BCller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wr=
ote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> some times ago, there was a feature request regarding client
> isolation for WLAN networks ran by local hostapd.
>=20
> This sounds like a good idea to me, and there is a patch available
> at https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D656&action=3Ddiff .
>=20
> Could somebody with a more WLAN knowledge than I have test this
> too, to make sure things do not break here? Thank you very much. :-)
>=20
> Corresponding issue is available at https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cg=
i?id=3D11974 .
>=20
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter M=C3=BCller
> --=20
> The road to Hades is easy to travel.
> 	-- Bion of Borysthenes


--===============0905842126876684322==--