public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alf Høgemark" <alf@i100.no>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: What is the process for suggesting bug fixes and improvements (bugtracker vs gitbug) ?
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:49:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F7B24F11-F2FD-4791-9DC2-096949D30383@i100.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392231844.5657.3.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2065 bytes --]


Hi
I will try to rebase my github pull requests to next branch then.
Thans for the info about the branches, it should probably be put on wiki on development page.

Alf

Den 12. feb. 2014 kl. 20:04 skrev Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>:

> Hi Alf,
> 
> the different branches have the following purpose:
> 
> master:
> Is the branch with the code that is currently shipped (core update n).
> 
> next:
> The branch which is going to become the next release (core update n+1).
> 
> On top of that, we sometimes have feature branches.
> 
> Everything that is sent our way should be branched from and apply to
> next. There might be some occasions where master is also suitable, but
> next is the default.
> 
> Best,
> -Michael
> 
> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 18:34 +0100, Alf Høgemark wrote:
>> On 02/09/2014 03:01 PM, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>>> Should I make an issue in the bug tracker for each of my pull
>>>> requests ?
>>>> Should I rather attach a patch to a bug tracker issue than issuing
>>>> pull requests on github ?
>>> Basically yes.
>>> 
>>> This might depend a little bit on what the changes include, but I think
>>> the bugtracker is the best option for most cases. You may still use your
>>> GitHub repository and point to the branch that should be pulled. A set
>>> of patches for each commit is also fine.
>> Could you give some information about what branches you use on 
>> git.ipfire.org ?
>> http://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-2.x.git;a=summary
>> 
>> I see the "next" branch, the "master" branch, "core75" branch and for 
>> example the "fifteen" branch.
>> I haven't found information about that on the wiki.
>> I would appreciate a few word about these branches.
>> 
>> Will 2.15 be "core76" ?
>> 
>> If I have some bug fixes for the current 2.13 core 75, what git branch 
>> should I work against ?
>> The "core75"  branch?
>> 
>> If I have some improvements that I think could maybe be part of 2.15, 
>> what git branch should I work against ?
>> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> Alf
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-12 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <52F735D7.9030709@i100.no>
2014-02-09 14:01 ` Michael Tremer
2014-02-11 17:34   ` Alf Høgemark
2014-02-12 19:04     ` Michael Tremer
2014-02-12 19:49       ` Alf Høgemark [this message]
2014-02-12 20:09         ` Michael Tremer
     [not found] <aa65d969e7d74d3aaafea9e8fbff05c2.squirrel@webmail.mailadmin.no>
2014-02-17 16:28 ` Michael Tremer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F7B24F11-F2FD-4791-9DC2-096949D30383@i100.no \
    --to=alf@i100.no \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox