From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Release planning for Core Update 127/128 and beyond...
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:40:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FC78CB61-AE2F-4414-AB81-96E19DBE4CC5@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b70898bd-d9d3-fcfc-e4a0-373d495c7e51@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1889 bytes --]
Hi,
Just a reminder for Core Update 129: I am planning to close this tomorrow.
Please let me know if you have any last-minute changes.
Otherwise we are ready to take patches for Core Update 130 from next week.
Best,
-Michael
> On 31 Jan 2019, at 18:29, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 31.01.2019 19:07, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> No worries, just wanted to coordinate and make sure that at least someone is working on it :)
>
> Yep - that's the way I read it. ;-)
>
> Testing took some time because of the problems that arouse here with the
> missing sse2 version of '/usr/lib/sse2/libcrypto.so.1.1' (running on an
> i586 system).
>
> Problem:
> Despite all efforts I can't update this file without running into an
> openssl "Bus error". System is dead as a dodo after the update.
>
> 'openssl version' still gives me "OpenSSL *1.1.0j* 20 Nov 2018
> (Library: OpenSSL *1.1.0i* 14 Aug 2018)" with 'libcrypto.so.1.1' being
> the culprit for the 1.1.0*i* version, IMHO.
>
> Do you have any hints how to update this file without breaking the
> system? I tried recompiling Core 126 and just copying it but this
> doesn't work. All connections die almost immediately. Each time. Copying
> the old file back and rebooting makes the machine working again.
>
> Besides that, Apache 2.4.38 is running here - patch follows...
>
> Best,
> Matthias
>
>>> On 31 Jan 2019, at 17:54, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 31.01.2019 13:06, Michael Tremer wrote:
>>>> For TLSv1.3 to work on the web UI, we still need the latest version of Apache and as far as I am aware of it Matthias is supposed to submit a patch for that, am I right?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> I'm in the midst of testing - won't take long...
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Matthias
>>
>>
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-07 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <b70898bd-d9d3-fcfc-e4a0-373d495c7e51@ipfire.org>
2019-03-07 16:40 ` Michael Tremer [this message]
2019-03-08 8:04 ` Alexander Koch
2019-03-08 10:12 ` Michael Tremer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FC78CB61-AE2F-4414-AB81-96E19DBE4CC5@ipfire.org \
--to=michael.tremer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox