From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Release planning for Core Update 127/128 and beyond... Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:40:55 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0818692650617705145==" List-Id: --===============0818692650617705145== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Just a reminder for Core Update 129: I am planning to close this tomorrow. Please let me know if you have any last-minute changes. Otherwise we are ready to take patches for Core Update 130 from next week. Best, -Michael > On 31 Jan 2019, at 18:29, Matthias Fischer = wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > On 31.01.2019 19:07, Michael Tremer wrote: >> No worries, just wanted to coordinate and make sure that at least someone = is working on it :) >=20 > Yep - that's the way I read it. ;-) >=20 > Testing took some time because of the problems that arouse here with the > missing sse2 version of '/usr/lib/sse2/libcrypto.so.1.1' (running on an > i586 system). >=20 > Problem: > Despite all efforts I can't update this file without running into an > openssl "Bus error". System is dead as a dodo after the update. >=20 > 'openssl version' still gives me "OpenSSL *1.1.0j* 20 Nov 2018 > (Library: OpenSSL *1.1.0i* 14 Aug 2018)" with 'libcrypto.so.1.1' being > the culprit for the 1.1.0*i* version, IMHO. >=20 > Do you have any hints how to update this file without breaking the > system? I tried recompiling Core 126 and just copying it but this > doesn't work. All connections die almost immediately. Each time. Copying > the old file back and rebooting makes the machine working again. >=20 > Besides that, Apache 2.4.38 is running here - patch follows... >=20 > Best, > Matthias >=20 >>> On 31 Jan 2019, at 17:54, Matthias Fischer wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> On 31.01.2019 13:06, Michael Tremer wrote: >>>> For TLSv1.3 to work on the web UI, we still need the latest version of A= pache and as far as I am aware of it Matthias is supposed to submit a patch f= or that, am I right? >>>=20 >>> Yes. >>>=20 >>> I'm in the midst of testing - won't take long... >>>=20 >>> Best, >>> Matthias >>=20 >>=20 >=20 --===============0818692650617705145==--